Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

OpenAttack: An Open-source Textual Adversarial Attack Toolkit

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2009.09191 v2 pith:72IB3WIF submitted 2020-09-19 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CR

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CR
keywords attackmodelsopenattackadversarialtextualexistingopen-sourcequick
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Textual adversarial attacking has received wide and increasing attention in recent years. Various attack models have been proposed, which are enormously distinct and implemented with different programming frameworks and settings. These facts hinder quick utilization and fair comparison of attack models. In this paper, we present an open-source textual adversarial attack toolkit named OpenAttack to solve these issues. Compared with existing other textual adversarial attack toolkits, OpenAttack has its unique strengths in support for all attack types, multilinguality, and parallel processing. Currently, OpenAttack includes 15 typical attack models that cover all attack types. Its highly inclusive modular design not only supports quick utilization of existing attack models, but also enables great flexibility and extensibility. OpenAttack has broad uses including comparing and evaluating attack models, measuring robustness of a model, assisting in developing new attack models, and adversarial training. Source code and documentation can be obtained at https://github.com/thunlp/OpenAttack.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Towards Action Hijacking of Large Language Model-based Agent

    cs.CR 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A RAG-based LLM application can be induced to assemble harmful SQL, code, or medical action plans from knowledge already stored in its database, with the user prompt itself carrying no forbidden words.

  2. Adversarial Attack Classification and Robustness Testing for Large Language Models for Code

    cs.SE 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Word-level adversarial changes in prompts, code, and comments degrade code-generation correctness more than sentence-level rewrites, but classification errors and missing error bars weaken the claim.

Pith tools