Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

On the Privacy Risks of Algorithmic Fairness

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2011.03731 v4 pith:ZZDVEJOS submitted 2020-11-07 stat.ML cs.CRcs.CYcs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.CRcs.CYcs.LG
keywords fairnessprivacydatafairlearningtrainingcostmachine
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Algorithmic fairness and privacy are essential pillars of trustworthy machine learning. Fair machine learning aims at minimizing discrimination against protected groups by, for example, imposing a constraint on models to equalize their behavior across different groups. This can subsequently change the influence of training data points on the fair model, in a disproportionate way. We study how this can change the information leakage of the model about its training data. We analyze the privacy risks of group fairness (e.g., equalized odds) through the lens of membership inference attacks: inferring whether a data point is used for training a model. We show that fairness comes at the cost of privacy, and this cost is not distributed equally: the information leakage of fair models increases significantly on the unprivileged subgroups, which are the ones for whom we need fair learning. We show that the more biased the training data is, the higher the privacy cost of achieving fairness for the unprivileged subgroups will be. We provide comprehensive empirical analysis for general machine learning algorithms.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Auditing Fairness-Privacy Trade-offs: Subpopulation-Level Effects of Fairness-Enhancing Algorithms

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Fairness-enhancing algorithms do not uniformly change membership-inference privacy risk; the effect depends on model architecture, subgroup size, and mitigation strategy, and DP's utility costs fall unevenly across subgroups.

Pith tools