REVIEW 1 cited by
Recent Advances on Neural Network Pruning at Initialization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Neural network pruning typically removes connections or neurons from a pretrained converged model; while a new pruning paradigm, pruning at initialization (PaI), attempts to prune a randomly initialized network. This paper offers the first survey concentrated on this emerging pruning fashion. We first introduce a generic formulation of neural network pruning, followed by the major classic pruning topics. Then, as the main body of this paper, a thorough and structured literature review of PaI methods is presented, consisting of two major tracks (sparse training and sparse selection). Finally, we summarize the surge of PaI compared to PaT and discuss the open problems. Apart from the dedicated literature review, this paper also offers a code base for easy sanity-checking and benchmarking of different PaI methods.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A Comparative Study of Pruning Methods in Transformer-based Time Series Forecasting
A benchmark shows most time-series Transformers tolerate about 50% unstructured pruning without clear accuracy loss, while structured pruning rarely delivers meaningful inference speedups.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.