Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Machine learning methods for postprocessing ensemble forecasts of wind gusts: A systematic comparison

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.09512 v1 pith:PHM77POK submitted 2021-06-17 stat.ML cs.LGphysics.ao-phstat.AP

classification stat.MLcs.LGphysics.ao-phstat.AP
keywords postprocessingensemblemethodssystematicweatherwindforecastslearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Postprocessing ensemble weather predictions to correct systematic errors has become a standard practice in research and operations. However, only few recent studies have focused on ensemble postprocessing of wind gust forecasts, despite its importance for severe weather warnings. Here, we provide a comprehensive review and systematic comparison of eight statistical and machine learning methods for probabilistic wind gust forecasting via ensemble postprocessing, that can be divided in three groups: State of the art postprocessing techniques from statistics (ensemble model output statistics (EMOS), member-by-member postprocessing, isotonic distributional regression), established machine learning methods (gradient-boosting extended EMOS, quantile regression forests) and neural network-based approaches (distributional regression network, Bernstein quantile network, histogram estimation network). The methods are systematically compared using six years of data from a high-resolution, convection-permitting ensemble prediction system that was run operationally at the German weather service, and hourly observations at 175 surface weather stations in Germany. While all postprocessing methods yield calibrated forecasts and are able to correct the systematic errors of the raw ensemble predictions, incorporating information from additional meteorological predictor variables beyond wind gusts leads to significant improvements in forecast skill. In particular, we propose a flexible framework of locally adaptive neural networks with different probabilistic forecast types as output, which not only significantly outperform all benchmark postprocessing methods but also learn physically consistent relations associated with the diurnal cycle, especially the evening transition of the planetary boundary layer.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Bayesian Deep Learning for Convective Initiation Nowcasting Uncertainty Estimation

    physics.ao-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    On GOES-16 data, a deep ensemble plus MC dropout yields the best calibrated probabilistic convective initiation nowcasts among five Bayesian deep learning methods.

Pith tools