REVIEW 1 cited by
Conflict Avoidance in Social Navigation -- a Survey
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
A major goal in robotics is to enable intelligent mobile robots to operate smoothly in shared human-robot environments. One of the most fundamental capabilities in service of this goal is competent navigation in this ``social" context. As a result, there has been a recent surge of research on social navigation; and especially as it relates to the handling of conflicts between agents during social navigation. These developments introduce a variety of models and algorithms, however as this research area is inherently interdisciplinary, many of the relevant papers are not comparable and there is no shared standard vocabulary. This survey aims to bridge this gap by introducing such a common language, using it to survey existing work, and highlighting open problems. It starts by defining the boundaries of this survey to a limited, yet highly common type of social navigation - conflict avoidance. Within this proposed scope, this survey introduces a detailed taxonomy of the conflict avoidance components. This survey then maps existing work into this taxonomy, while discussing papers using its framing. Finally, this paper proposes some future research directions and open problems that are currently on the frontier of social navigation to aid ongoing and future research.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Opinion-Driven Decision-Making for Multi-Robot Navigation through Narrow Corridors
Simulations show that robot teams can coordinate single-file corridor passage by estimating each other's preferences over passing orders via Nonlinear Opinion Dynamics, reaching near-100% success with as few as one ob...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.