Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Johnson-Lindenstrauss Lemma, Linear and Nonlinear Random Projections, Random Fourier Features, and Random Kitchen Sinks: Tutorial and Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2108.04172 v1 pith:TVD3VIPU submitted 2021-08-09 stat.ML cs.DScs.LGmath.PR

classification stat.MLcs.DScs.LGmath.PR
keywords randomprojectionnonlinearprojectionslemmalinearexplainedfeatures
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

This is a tutorial and survey paper on the Johnson-Lindenstrauss (JL) lemma and linear and nonlinear random projections. We start with linear random projection and then justify its correctness by JL lemma and its proof. Then, sparse random projections with $\ell_1$ norm and interpolation norm are introduced. Two main applications of random projection, which are low-rank matrix approximation and approximate nearest neighbor search by random projection onto hypercube, are explained. Random Fourier Features (RFF) and Random Kitchen Sinks (RKS) are explained as methods for nonlinear random projection. Some other methods for nonlinear random projection, including extreme learning machine, randomly weighted neural networks, and ensemble of random projections, are also introduced.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. PySeizure: A single machine learning classifier framework to detect seizures in diverse datasets

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A unified EEG seizure-detection framework with standardized preprocessing and majority voting reaches within-dataset AUC 0.86-0.90 and cross-dataset AUC 0.615-0.762 across CHB-MIT and TUSZ.

Pith tools