Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Primer: Searching for Efficient Transformers for Language Modeling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.08668 v2 pith:4PVEPCN5 submitted 2021-09-17 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CLcs.NE

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CLcs.NE
keywords primertrainingtransformerlanguagecomputecostmodelingmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Transformer models have been central to recent advances in natural language processing. The training and inference costs of these models, however, have grown rapidly and become prohibitively expensive. Here we aim to reduce the costs of Transformers by searching for a more efficient variant. Compared to previous approaches, our search is performed at a lower level, over the primitives that define a Transformer TensorFlow program. We identify an architecture, named Primer, that has a smaller training cost than the original Transformer and other variants for auto-regressive language modeling. Primer's improvements can be mostly attributed to two simple modifications: squaring ReLU activations and adding a depthwise convolution layer after each Q, K, and V projection in self-attention. Experiments show Primer's gains over Transformer increase as compute scale grows and follow a power law with respect to quality at optimal model sizes. We also verify empirically that Primer can be dropped into different codebases to significantly speed up training without additional tuning. For example, at a 500M parameter size, Primer improves the original T5 architecture on C4 auto-regressive language modeling, reducing the training cost by 4X. Furthermore, the reduced training cost means Primer needs much less compute to reach a target one-shot performance. For instance, in a 1.9B parameter configuration similar to GPT-3 XL, Primer uses 1/3 of the training compute to achieve the same one-shot performance as Transformer. We open source our models and several comparisons in T5 to help with reproducibility.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Can Transformers Really Do It All? On the Compatibility of Inductive Biases Across Tasks

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Learned replacement non-linearities show transformers are rarely optimal for algorithmic tasks, with benefits that are task-specific, while language/code gains are smaller and more transferable.

  2. Physics of Language Models: Part 4.1, Architecture Design and the Magic of Canon Layers

    cs.CL 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Canon layers—residual 1-d causal convolutions over adjacent tokens—boost synthetic reasoning depth 2-4x, lift NoPE to RoPE level, and bring GLA up to Mamba2/GDN, with qualitative real-world confirmation.

  3. Domyn-Small: A European 10B Reasoning Language Model

    cs.CL 2026-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Domyn-Small is a 10B reasoning LLM that claims to deliver roughly one-third the inference tokens of Qwen3.5-9B at competitive accuracy, though results are marked as preliminary.

  4. TriADA: Massively Parallel Trilinear Matrix-by-Tensor Multiply-Add Algorithm and Device Architecture for the Acceleration of 3D Discrete Transformations

    cs.DC 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper proposes a triple-stage outer-product algorithm and an isomorphic 3D mesh architecture that computes separable 3D orthogonal transforms in N1+N2+N3 time steps.

Pith tools