Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Word-level confidence estimation for RNN transducers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.15222 v1 pith:OTM4K6P3 submitted 2021-09-28 cs.CL cs.SDeess.AS

classification cs.CLcs.SDeess.AS
keywords confidencemodelapplicationsdifferenterrorsestimatefurthermapping
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Confidence estimate is an often requested feature in applications such as medical transcription where errors can impact patient care and the confidence estimate could be used to alert medical professionals to verify potential errors in recognition. In this paper, we present a lightweight neural confidence model tailored for Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) system with Recurrent Neural Network Transducers (RNN-T). Compared to other existing approaches, our model utilizes: (a) the time information associated with recognized words, which reduces the computational complexity, and (b) a simple and elegant trick for mapping between sub-word and word sequences. The mapping addresses the non-unique tokenization and token deletion problems while amplifying differences between confusable words. Through extensive empirical evaluations on two different long-form test sets, we demonstrate that the model achieves a performance of 0.4 Normalized Cross Entropy (NCE) and 0.05 Expected Calibration Error (ECE). It is robust across different ASR configurations, including target types (graphemes vs. morphemes), traffic conditions (streaming vs. non-streaming), and encoder types. We further discuss the importance of evaluation metrics to reflect practical applications and highlight the need for further work in improving Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Negative Precision Rate (NPV) and True Negative Rate (TNR).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools