REVIEW 4 cited by
A Survey on Scenario-Based Testing for Automated Driving Systems in High-Fidelity Simulation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Automated Driving Systems (ADSs) have seen rapid progress in recent years. To ensure the safety and reliability of these systems, extensive testings are being conducted before their future mass deployment. Testing the system on the road is the closest to real-world and desirable approach, but it is incredibly costly. Also, it is infeasible to cover rare corner cases using such real-world testing. Thus, a popular alternative is to evaluate an ADS's performance in some well-designed challenging scenarios, a.k.a. scenario-based testing. High-fidelity simulators have been widely used in this setting to maximize flexibility and convenience in testing what-if scenarios. Although many works have been proposed offering diverse frameworks/methods for testing specific systems, the comparisons and connections among these works are still missing. To bridge this gap, in this work, we provide a generic formulation of scenario-based testing in high-fidelity simulation and conduct a literature review on the existing works. We further compare them and present the open challenges as well as potential future research directions.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
SinD 2.0: A Multi-City UAV Dataset with Semantic Risk Annotations for SOTIF-Oriented Safety Validation at Signalized Intersections
A multi-city drone intersection dataset with 53,000 tracks, 32,682 safety-critical events, and semantic risk labels for SOTIF testing of autonomous driving.
-
Cam2Sim: Neural Scenario Reconstruction for Closed-Loop Autonomous Driving Simulation
Cam2Sim rebuilds real urban drives as CARLA scenarios with Gaussian-Splatting camera rendering that completes closed-loop DAVE-2 runs where standard CARLA rendering fails.
-
MoDitector: Module-Directed Testing for Autonomous Driving Systems
MoDitector generates collision scenarios that are caused by errors in a user-specified ADS module, reporting 55.3, 75.3, 71.7, and 14.3 module-induced critical scenarios for perception, prediction, planning, and contr...
-
Bayesian Optimization applied for accelerated Virtual Validation of the Autonomous Driving Function
A Bayesian optimization framework finds critical scenarios for an MPC motion planner using one to two orders of magnitude fewer simulations than full-factorial testing.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.