Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Structured access: an emerging paradigm for safe AI deployment

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2201.05159 v2 pith:NEFGZ5HU submitted 2022-01-13 cs.AI cs.HCcs.SE

classification cs.AIcs.HCcs.SE
keywords accessstructuredsystemcloud-basedthereusedcapabilitiesdeployment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Structured access is an emerging paradigm for the safe deployment of artificial intelligence (AI). Instead of openly disseminating AI systems, developers facilitate controlled, arm's length interactions with their AI systems. The aim is to prevent dangerous AI capabilities from being widely accessible, whilst preserving access to AI capabilities that can be used safely. The developer must both restrict how the AI system can be used, and prevent the user from circumventing these restrictions through modification or reverse engineering of the AI system. Structured access is most effective when implemented through cloud-based AI services, rather than disseminating AI software that runs locally on users' hardware. Cloud-based interfaces provide the AI developer greater scope for controlling how the AI system is used, and for protecting against unauthorized modifications to the system's design. This chapter expands the discussion of "publication norms" in the AI community, which to date has focused on the question of how the informational content of AI research projects should be disseminated (e.g., code and models). Although this is an important question, there are limits to what can be achieved through the control of information flows. Structured access views AI software not only as information that can be shared but also as a tool with which users can have arm's length interactions. There are early examples of structured access being practiced by AI developers, but there is much room for further development, both in the functionality of cloud-based interfaces and in the wider institutional framework.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Oracle's Gambit: A Game-Theoretic Framework for Responsible AI Release

    cs.GT 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Defender welfare in AI-enabled cyber contests depends on the capability gap from sequenced access, not shared model level, so pre-release is the lab's equilibrium strategy.

  2. The Ethics of Autonomous AI Agents for Offensive Security

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Autonomous AI hacking tools combine three kinds of indeterminacy—action, impact, and users—making moral responsibility diffuse and giving attackers a short-term advantage under current cost asymmetries.

  3. An Example Safety Case for Safeguards Against Misuse

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A proposed framework, built around an 'uplift model' that translates red-team safeguard-evasion data into estimated risk, for justifying that AI misuse safeguards keep large-scale harm risk below a threshold.

  4. Technical Requirements for Halting Dangerous AI Activities

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A taxonomy of compute-centric technical interventions, graded by readiness and mapped to five AI governance plans, argues that halting dangerous AI requires substantial control over AI compute.

  5. The Societal Impact of Foundation Models: Advancing Evidence-based AI Policy

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A dissertation that synthesizes prior work on foundation models into a three-part framework: conceptual framing, empirical measurement (HELM, FMTI), and evidence-based AI policy.

Pith tools