Pith. sign in

REVIEW

An Empirical Investigation of Personalization Factors on TikTok

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2201.12271 v1 pith:X4SAGLWQ submitted 2022-01-28 cs.HC cs.CYcs.SI

classification cs.HCcs.CYcs.SI
keywords tiktokcontentalgorithmempiricalfactorsinfluencelike-featureplatform
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

TikTok currently is the fastest growing social media platform with over 1 billion active monthly users of which the majority is from generation Z. Arguably, its most important success driver is its recommendation system. Despite the importance of TikTok's algorithm to the platform's success and content distribution, little work has been done on the empirical analysis of the algorithm. Our work lays the foundation to fill this research gap. Using a sock-puppet audit methodology with a custom algorithm developed by us, we tested and analysed the effect of the language and location used to access TikTok, follow- and like-feature, as well as how the recommended content changes as a user watches certain posts longer than others. We provide evidence that all the tested factors influence the content recommended to TikTok users. Further, we identified that the follow-feature has the strongest influence, followed by the like-feature and video view rate. We also discuss the implications of our findings in the context of the formation of filter bubbles on TikTok and the proliferation of problematic content.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools