Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Cellular Segmentation and Composition in Routine Histology Images using Deep Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.02510 v1 pith:3I5Z3DVQ submitted 2022-03-04 q-bio.QM cs.CVcs.LGeess.IV

classification q-bio.QMcs.CVcs.LGeess.IV
keywords compositionnucleisegmentationcellularachievedalbrtclassificationhistology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Identification and quantification of nuclei in colorectal cancer haematoxylin \& eosin (H\&E) stained histology images is crucial to prognosis and patient management. In computational pathology these tasks are referred to as nuclear segmentation, classification and composition and are used to extract meaningful interpretable cytological and architectural features for downstream analysis. The CoNIC challenge poses the task of automated nuclei segmentation, classification and composition into six different types of nuclei from the largest publicly known nuclei dataset - Lizard. In this regard, we have developed pipelines for the prediction of nuclei segmentation using HoVer-Net and ALBRT for cellular composition. On testing on the preliminary test set, HoVer-Net achieved a PQ of 0.58, a PQ+ of 0.58 and finally a mPQ+ of 0.35. For the prediction of cellular composition with ALBRT on the preliminary test set, we achieved an overall $R^2$ score of 0.53, consisting of 0.84 for lymphocytes, 0.70 for epithelial cells, 0.70 for plasma and .060 for eosinophils.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools