REVIEW 3 cited by
Where Does the Performance Improvement Come From? -- A Reproducibility Concern about Image-Text Retrieval
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This article aims to provide the information retrieval community with some reflections on recent advances in retrieval learning by analyzing the reproducibility of image-text retrieval models. Due to the increase of multimodal data over the last decade, image-text retrieval has steadily become a major research direction in the field of information retrieval. Numerous researchers train and evaluate image-text retrieval algorithms using benchmark datasets such as MS-COCO and Flickr30k. Research in the past has mostly focused on performance, with multiple state-of-the-art methodologies being suggested in a variety of ways. According to their assertions, these techniques provide improved modality interactions and hence more precise multimodal representations. In contrast to previous works, we focus on the reproducibility of the approaches and the examination of the elements that lead to improved performance by pretrained and nonpretrained models in retrieving images and text. To be more specific, we first examine the related reproducibility concerns and explain why our focus is on image-text retrieval tasks. Second, we systematically summarize the current paradigm of image-text retrieval models and the stated contributions of those approaches. Third, we analyze various aspects of the reproduction of pretrained and nonpretrained retrieval models. To complete this, we conducted ablation experiments and obtained some influencing factors that affect retrieval recall more than the improvement claimed in the original paper. Finally, we present some reflections and challenges that the retrieval community should consider in the future. Our source code is publicly available at https://github.com/WangFei-2019/Image-text-Retrieval.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
MDIT-Bench: Evaluating the Dual-Implicit Toxicity in Large Multimodal Models
The authors release a large multimodal benchmark showing that current LMMs struggle to detect toxicity that emerges only from combining image and text, and that many-shot toxic demonstrations further reduce their accuracy.
-
SEAL: Structure and Element Aware Learning to Improve Long Structured Document Retrieval
A contrastive fine-tuning recipe that adds HTML structure and element-masking signals improves long structured document retrieval, with reported MRR@10 gains of about four points on BGE-M3.
-
APT: Improving Specialist LLM Performance with Weakness Case Acquisition and Iterative Preference Training
APT trains a model on its own wrong answers plus retrieved similar answers using iterative DPO with SFT loss, improving math, code, and instruction-following while keeping general benchmarks about flat.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.