Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Multilingual Simultaneous Speech Translation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.14835 v2 pith:RRWLGGS6 submitted 2022-03-28 cs.CL cs.SDeess.AS

classification cs.CLcs.SDeess.AS
keywords translationspeechapproacharchitecturesend-to-endmodelsmultilingualonline
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Applications designed for simultaneous speech translation during events such as conferences or meetings need to balance quality and lag while displaying translated text to deliver a good user experience. One common approach to building online spoken language translation systems is by leveraging models built for offline speech translation. Based on a technique to adapt end-to-end monolingual models, we investigate multilingual models and different architectures (end-to-end and cascade) on the ability to perform online speech translation. On the multilingual TEDx corpus, we show that the approach generalizes to different architectures. We see similar gains in latency reduction (40% relative) across languages and architectures. However, the end-to-end architecture leads to smaller translation quality losses after adapting to the online model. Furthermore, the approach even scales to zero-shot directions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. How "Real" is Your Real-Time Simultaneous Speech-to-Text Translation System?

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A survey of 110 SimulST papers shows most systems rely on unrealistic human pre-segmented audio and inconsistent terminology, and it offers a taxonomy and recommendations to fix both.

Pith tools