Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Perfectly Accurate Membership Inference by a Dishonest Central Server in Federated Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.16463 v2 pith:BAGB7C7N submitted 2022-03-30 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CR

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CR
keywords centralservertrainingaccuracycelebacifar100clientsdatasets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Federated Learning is expected to provide strong privacy guarantees, as only gradients or model parameters but no plain text training data is ever exchanged either between the clients or between the clients and the central server. In this paper, we challenge this claim by introducing a simple but still very effective membership inference attack algorithm, which relies only on a single training step. In contrast to the popular honest-but-curious model, we investigate a framework with a dishonest central server. Our strategy is applicable to models with ReLU activations and uses the properties of this activation function to achieve perfect accuracy. Empirical evaluation on visual classification tasks with MNIST, CIFAR10, CIFAR100 and CelebA datasets show that our method provides perfect accuracy in identifying one sample in a training set with thousands of samples. Occasional failures of our method lead us to discover duplicate images in the CIFAR100 and CelebA datasets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses in Federated Learning: A Survey

    cs.CR 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A comprehensive survey of membership inference attacks and defenses in federated learning, proposing update-based and trend-based attack taxonomies and four defense categories.

Pith tools