Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Analyzing Voting Power in Decentralized Governance: Who controls DAOs?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2204.01176 v1 pith:WUTDC3LF submitted 2022-04-03 cs.CY cs.CRcs.GT

classification cs.CYcs.CRcs.GT
keywords governancevotingpowersystemsanalyzeanalyzingblockchaincompound
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We empirically study the state of three prominent DAO governance systems on the Ethereum blockchain: Compound, Uniswap and ENS. In particular, we examine how the voting power is distributed in these systems. Using a comprehensive dataset of all governance token holders, delegates, proposals and votes, we analyze who holds the voting rights and how they are used to influence governance decisions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Voting Biases in Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) Governance

    cs.CY 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Author-selected Snapshot choices show a 58.8 pp higher voting-power share than non-author choices, exceeding approval (27.1 pp) and first-list (7.7 pp) associations.

  2. Concentration in Governance Control Across Decentralised Finance Protocols

    cs.CE 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A statistically validated network of shared DeFi governance token holdings reveals persistent, institution-dominated links between protocols.

Pith tools