REVIEW 2 cited by
Analyzing Voting Power in Decentralized Governance: Who controls DAOs?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We empirically study the state of three prominent DAO governance systems on the Ethereum blockchain: Compound, Uniswap and ENS. In particular, we examine how the voting power is distributed in these systems. Using a comprehensive dataset of all governance token holders, delegates, proposals and votes, we analyze who holds the voting rights and how they are used to influence governance decisions.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Voting Biases in Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) Governance
Author-selected Snapshot choices show a 58.8 pp higher voting-power share than non-author choices, exceeding approval (27.1 pp) and first-list (7.7 pp) associations.
-
Concentration in Governance Control Across Decentralised Finance Protocols
A statistically validated network of shared DeFi governance token holdings reveals persistent, institution-dominated links between protocols.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.