Pith. sign in

REVIEW 13 cited by

Unlocking High-Accuracy Differentially Private Image Classification through Scale

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2204.13650 v2 pith:2OUI3ZU7 submitted 2022-04-28 cs.LG cs.CRcs.CVstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.CRcs.CVstat.ML
keywords dp-sgdaccuracyclassificationimageprivacyprivatesotatraining
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Differential Privacy (DP) provides a formal privacy guarantee preventing adversaries with access to a machine learning model from extracting information about individual training points. Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD), the most popular DP training method for deep learning, realizes this protection by injecting noise during training. However previous works have found that DP-SGD often leads to a significant degradation in performance on standard image classification benchmarks. Furthermore, some authors have postulated that DP-SGD inherently performs poorly on large models, since the norm of the noise required to preserve privacy is proportional to the model dimension. In contrast, we demonstrate that DP-SGD on over-parameterized models can perform significantly better than previously thought. Combining careful hyper-parameter tuning with simple techniques to ensure signal propagation and improve the convergence rate, we obtain a new SOTA without extra data on CIFAR-10 of 81.4% under (8, 10^{-5})-DP using a 40-layer Wide-ResNet, improving over the previous SOTA of 71.7%. When fine-tuning a pre-trained NFNet-F3, we achieve a remarkable 83.8% top-1 accuracy on ImageNet under (0.5, 8*10^{-7})-DP. Additionally, we also achieve 86.7% top-1 accuracy under (8, 8 \cdot 10^{-7})-DP, which is just 4.3% below the current non-private SOTA for this task. We believe our results are a significant step towards closing the accuracy gap between private and non-private image classification.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 13 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 34 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Sequential Auditing for f-Differential Privacy

    cs.CR 2026-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A new sequential auditor for f-differential privacy adaptively chooses its sample size, detects violations across the whole privacy tradeoff curve, and holds a user-set false-rejection rate.

  2. Correlating Cross-Iteration Noise for DP-SGD using Model Curvature

    cs.LG 2025-10 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Using Hessian eigenvalues from public data to design correlated noise for DP-SGD improves accuracy by 1–4% over current DP-MF methods.

  3. Adapting to Linear Separable Subsets with Large-Margin in Differentially Private Learning

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A private halfspace learner achieves empirical and population zero-one error O(1/(γ²εn) + |S_out|/(γn)) for the best separable subset S_in = S\S_out with margin γ, without knowing γ or S_out in advance.

  4. Private Direct Preference Optimization for LLM Alignment

    cs.CR 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PrivDPO perturbs the DPO objective with an unbiased randomized rescaling to enforce epsilon-preference privacy, achieving near-DPO utility on three benchmarks and three LLM families up to 32B.

  5. End-to-End Differential Privacy in Training Deep Neural Network Classifiers

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Perturbing softmax outputs with the Dirichlet mechanism during training yields input-private, label-public classifiers that beat prior differentially private training accuracy on five image benchmarks.

  6. Differentially Private Natural Gradient Descent

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DP-NGD enables second-order optimization under differential privacy by decoupling curvature estimation onto public data, performing isotropic DP operations in a whitened space, and dynamically clamping curvature eigen...

  7. An Interactive Framework for Finding the Optimal Trade-off in Differential Privacy

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Modeling the privacy-accuracy Pareto front with sigmoid curves and letting users pick points on hypothetical fronts finds the optimal DP privacy budget with fewer queries and evaluations than pairwise baselines.

  8. Lower Bounds for Public-Private Learning under Distribution Shift

    cs.LG 2025-07 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    For Gaussian mean estimation and linear regression with distribution shift, the paper claims that public data never provides complementary value: either public data alone suffices, or (for large shifts) private data a...

  9. Optimizing Canaries for Privacy Auditing with Metagradient Descent

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Optimized canary examples, crafted by metagradient descent on a small non-private model, more than double empirical epsilon lower bounds in black-box DP-SGD privacy audits on CIFAR-10.

  10. Implementing Adaptations for Vision AutoRegressive Model

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Fine-tuned Vision AutoRegressive models mostly beat a strong diffusion baseline on downstream image generation, but DP fine-tuning yields poor FID scores.

  11. UniAud: A Unified Auditing Framework for High Auditing Power and Utility with One Training Run

    cs.CR 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    UniAud uses synthetic uncorrelated canaries and self-comparison inference to reach near-optimal empirical epsilon lower bounds in one black-box DP audit run, while UniAud++ improves the utility-auditing trade-off via ...

  12. The pretraining domain outweighs the training objective in setting the privacy-utility trade-off of differentially private medical image analysis

    cs.CV 2026-01 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    In DP-SGD chest X-ray classification, MIMIC-CXR supervised pretraining beats ImageNet and DINOv3 initializations, but the study cannot cleanly separate pretraining domain from objective because key comparison arms are...

  13. Mitigating Disparate Impact of Differentially Private Learning through Bounded Adaptive Clipping

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Bounded adaptive clipping puts a floor under the adaptive clipping threshold in DP-SGD and improves worst-class accuracy on skewed and Fashion MNIST.

Pith tools