Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Bias and Fairness on Multimodal Emotion Detection Algorithms

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.08383 v1 pith:MIBLAUNP submitted 2022-05-11 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CLcs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CLcs.CV
keywords biasfairnessmultimodalemotionalgorithmsmajoritymodalitiesmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Numerous studies have shown that machine learning algorithms can latch onto protected attributes such as race and gender and generate predictions that systematically discriminate against one or more groups. To date the majority of bias and fairness research has been on unimodal models. In this work, we explore the biases that exist in emotion recognition systems in relationship to the modalities utilized, and study how multimodal approaches affect system bias and fairness. We consider audio, text, and video modalities, as well as all possible multimodal combinations of those, and find that text alone has the least bias, and accounts for the majority of the models' performances, raising doubts about the worthiness of multimodal emotion recognition systems when bias and fairness are desired alongside model performance.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. TrustSkin: A Fairness Pipeline for Trustworthy Facial Affect Analysis Across Skin Tone

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Using a hue-lightness skin tone measure reveals larger emotion recognition gaps for dark-skinned faces on AffectNet than the ITA measure, but the dark group has only 52 test images.

  2. FAIRWELL: Fair Multimodal Self-Supervised Learning for Wellbeing Prediction

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    FAIRWELL modifies the VICReg self-supervised loss to be subject-aware and pooling-based, improving fairness metrics on D-Vlog, MIMIC, and MODMA with minimal performance drop.

Pith tools