REVIEW 2 cited by
Bias and Fairness on Multimodal Emotion Detection Algorithms
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Numerous studies have shown that machine learning algorithms can latch onto protected attributes such as race and gender and generate predictions that systematically discriminate against one or more groups. To date the majority of bias and fairness research has been on unimodal models. In this work, we explore the biases that exist in emotion recognition systems in relationship to the modalities utilized, and study how multimodal approaches affect system bias and fairness. We consider audio, text, and video modalities, as well as all possible multimodal combinations of those, and find that text alone has the least bias, and accounts for the majority of the models' performances, raising doubts about the worthiness of multimodal emotion recognition systems when bias and fairness are desired alongside model performance.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
TrustSkin: A Fairness Pipeline for Trustworthy Facial Affect Analysis Across Skin Tone
Using a hue-lightness skin tone measure reveals larger emotion recognition gaps for dark-skinned faces on AffectNet than the ITA measure, but the dark group has only 52 test images.
-
FAIRWELL: Fair Multimodal Self-Supervised Learning for Wellbeing Prediction
FAIRWELL modifies the VICReg self-supervised loss to be subject-aware and pooling-based, improving fairness metrics on D-Vlog, MIMIC, and MODMA with minimal performance drop.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.