Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

LST: Ladder Side-Tuning for Parameter and Memory Efficient Transfer Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.06522 v2 pith:EMM5JBNW submitted 2022-06-13 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CV

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CV
keywords memorynetworkbackboneladdermethodsmodelsonlyparameters
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Fine-tuning large pre-trained models on downstream tasks has been adopted in a variety of domains recently. However, it is costly to update the entire parameter set of large pre-trained models. Although recently proposed parameter-efficient transfer learning (PETL) techniques allow updating a small subset of parameters (e.g. only using 2% of parameters) inside a pre-trained backbone network for a new task, they only reduce the training memory requirement by up to 30%. This is because the gradient computation for the trainable parameters still requires backpropagation through the large pre-trained backbone model. To address this, we propose Ladder Side-Tuning (LST), a new PETL technique that can reduce training memory requirements by more substantial amounts. Unlike existing parameter-efficient methods that insert additional parameters inside backbone networks, we train a ladder side network, a small and separate network that takes intermediate activations as input via shortcut connections (called ladders) from backbone networks and makes predictions. LST has significantly lower memory requirements than previous methods, because it does not require backpropagation through the backbone network, but instead only through the side network and ladder connections. We evaluate our method with various models (T5 and CLIP-T5) on both NLP (GLUE) and vision-and-language (VQA, GQA, NLVR2 , MSCOCO) tasks. LST saves 69% of the memory costs to fine-tune the whole network, while other methods only save 26% of that in similar parameter usages (hence, 2.7x more memory savings). Moreover, LST achieves higher accuracy than Adapter and LoRA in a low-memory regime. To further show the advantage of this better memory efficiency, we also apply LST to larger T5 models, attaining better GLUE performance than full fine-tuning and other PETL methods. The accuracy-efficiency trade-off also holds on VL tasks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LARA: Lightweight Adapters in the Residual Stream for Composable Adaptation and Alignment

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Low-rank residual-stream adapters match LoRA at near-equal parameter counts on code fine-tuning and DPO, and support inference-time scaling plus per-token routing of seven behaviors on one frozen 1.5B model.

  2. Learning Text Styles: A Study on Transfer, Attribution, and Verification

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A thesis compiles published work claiming that lightweight adapters, contrastive disentanglement, and instruction tuning improve text style transfer, authorship attribution, and authorship verification.

Pith tools