Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Language Modelling with Pixels

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2207.06991 v2 pith:YR76ROVZ submitted 2022-07-14 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CVcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CVcs.LG
keywords pixellanguagebertpixelslanguagesscriptsbottleneckdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Language models are defined over a finite set of inputs, which creates a vocabulary bottleneck when we attempt to scale the number of supported languages. Tackling this bottleneck results in a trade-off between what can be represented in the embedding matrix and computational issues in the output layer. This paper introduces PIXEL, the Pixel-based Encoder of Language, which suffers from neither of these issues. PIXEL is a pretrained language model that renders text as images, making it possible to transfer representations across languages based on orthographic similarity or the co-activation of pixels. PIXEL is trained to reconstruct the pixels of masked patches instead of predicting a distribution over tokens. We pretrain the 86M parameter PIXEL model on the same English data as BERT and evaluate on syntactic and semantic tasks in typologically diverse languages, including various non-Latin scripts. We find that PIXEL substantially outperforms BERT on syntactic and semantic processing tasks on scripts that are not found in the pretraining data, but PIXEL is slightly weaker than BERT when working with Latin scripts. Furthermore, we find that PIXEL is more robust than BERT to orthographic attacks and linguistic code-switching, further confirming the benefits of modelling language with pixels.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Pixels for Programs? A Cross-Provider Case Study of Input-Token Accounting for Source Code as Text and Images

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Across 675 paired API calls, image input-token reductions are 86.5% (Anthropic), 80.6% (OpenAI), and 75.8% (Gemini) under token-volume weighting, with Gemini images costing far more than text below 200 lines.

  2. EvolKV: Evolutionary KV Cache Compression for LLM Inference

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CMA-ES search over per-layer KV cache budgets beats uniform and pyramidal compression heuristics on LongBench, NIAH, RULER, and GSM8K, and edges past the full cache on one code dataset at 1.5% of the budget.

Pith tools