pith. sign in

arxiv: 2209.07472 · v2 · submitted 2022-08-05 · ⚛️ physics.gen-ph

A (D_τ,D_x)-manifold with N-correlators of N_t-objects

Pierros Ntelis This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 10:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.gen-ph
keywords manifoldcorrelatorsfield theorytopologyFourier transformcosmological scalesquantum scalescross-correlations
0
0 comments X

The pith

A (D_τ, D_x)-dimensional manifold incorporates N-correlators of N_t object types with cross terms and contaminants.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out a mathematical formalism for building a manifold in separate time and space dimensions that carries N-correlators among N_t distinct object types. The construction relies on standard elements of field theory, topology, algebra, n-point statistics, and Fourier transforms. It is presented as usable for phenomena that range from astronomical distances down to quantum scales, with intuitive examples supplied for each regime. A reader would care if the structure succeeds because it supplies one consistent object for tracking correlations and contaminants across those regimes.

Core claim

The paper claims that a (D_τ, D_x)-manifold equipped with N-correlators of N_t object types, including their cross-correlations and contaminants, can be defined using elementary notions from field theory, topology, algebra, statistics of n-correlators, and the Fourier transform, and that this structure applies directly to physical systems from cosmological to quantum scales.

What carries the argument

The (D_τ, D_x)-manifold with N-correlators of N_t types of objects, which organizes the cross-correlations and contaminants inside a single geometric object.

If this is right

  • The same manifold can describe both large-scale astronomical observations and small-scale quantum measurements.
  • Cross-correlations and contaminants between different object types are handled inside one structure rather than by separate models.
  • The formalism supplies intuitive examples that illustrate its use at each scale.
  • No additional physical assumptions beyond the listed mathematical tools are required for the construction.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the manifold can be realized explicitly, it would offer a single language for statistical analyses that currently use different correlation functions at different scales.
  • The approach might be tested by checking whether Fourier-space representations of the N-correlators remain consistent when the manifold dimension is varied.
  • Neighbouring problems such as multi-tracer cosmology or multi-particle quantum correlations could adopt the same correlator structure without rescaling.

Load-bearing premise

The listed standard tools from field theory, topology, algebra, n-correlator statistics, and Fourier transforms are enough by themselves to produce a consistent manifold structure that works across astronomical to quantum scales.

What would settle it

An explicit construction of the manifold for a concrete dataset, such as galaxy clustering or particle collision records, that cannot accommodate the required cross-correlations without introducing extra ad-hoc rules would show the formalism does not hold as stated.

read the original abstract

In this paper, we describe a mathematical formalism for a $(D_\tau,D_x)$-dimensional manifold with $N$-correlators of $N_t$ types of objects, with cross correlations and contaminants. In particular, we build this formalism using simple notions of mathematical physics, field theory, topology, algebra, statistics n-correlators and Fourier transform. We discuss the applicability of this formalism in the context of cosmological scales, i.e. from astronomical scales to quantum scales, for which we give some intuitive examples.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims to describe a mathematical formalism for a (D_τ,D_x)-dimensional manifold with N-correlators of N_t types of objects, including cross correlations and contaminants. The formalism is constructed from standard notions in mathematical physics, field theory, topology, algebra, statistics of n-correlators, and the Fourier transform. Applicability is discussed for phenomena ranging from astronomical to quantum scales, with some intuitive examples provided.

Significance. If a consistent, explicitly constructed formalism were demonstrated, it could potentially supply a unified framework for modeling multi-type systems with correlations across disparate scales. No such construction or verification is present, so significance cannot be assessed.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and full manuscript: the central claim requires an explicit atlas, transition functions, or measure on the (D_τ,D_x)-manifold that encodes N-correlators of N_t object types together with cross-correlations and contaminants. No such definitions, equations, or derivation from the listed standard tools are supplied, leaving the existence assertion undischarged.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their review. We respond to the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and full manuscript: the central claim requires an explicit atlas, transition functions, or measure on the (D_τ,D_x)-manifold that encodes N-correlators of N_t object types together with cross-correlations and contaminants. No such definitions, equations, or derivation from the listed standard tools are supplied, leaving the existence assertion undischarged.

    Authors: The manuscript presents the (D_τ,D_x)-manifold at a conceptual level by combining standard notions from field theory, topology, algebra, statistics of n-correlators, and the Fourier transform. We agree that the current version does not supply explicit definitions of an atlas, transition functions, or a measure that directly encodes the N-correlators together with cross-correlations and contaminants, nor a step-by-step derivation. In the revised manuscript we will add these explicit constructions and derivations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: new formalism announced using standard tools with no self-referential reduction shown

full rationale

The paper's abstract states it describes a formalism for a (D_τ,D_x)-manifold with N-correlators of N_t objects built from field theory, topology, algebra, statistics of n-correlators and Fourier transform, with applicability examples across scales. No equations, derivations, or load-bearing steps are supplied in the given text that reduce by construction to the introduced parameters themselves. No self-citations, fitted inputs called predictions, or ansatzes smuggled via prior work appear. The announcement relies on the listed external standard tools without exhibiting a tautological loop, making the derivation chain self-contained as a conceptual introduction rather than a closed self-definition.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 2 invented entities

The construction rests on the assumption that standard concepts from mathematical physics, field theory, topology, algebra, statistics of n-correlators and Fourier transforms can be combined to define a new manifold without further justification or consistency proofs.

free parameters (2)
  • D_τ, D_x
    Dimensional parameters of the manifold introduced without specified values or constraints.
  • N, N_t
    Number of correlators and object types chosen to define the structure.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard axioms of field theory, topology, algebra, and Fourier analysis suffice to construct the manifold.
    Invoked in the abstract as the building blocks.
invented entities (2)
  • (D_τ,D_x)-manifold no independent evidence
    purpose: Provide the geometric setting for the correlators.
    New postulated manifold structure.
  • N-correlators of N_t-objects with cross correlations and contaminants no independent evidence
    purpose: Define the statistical objects on the manifold.
    New correlator definition.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5612 in / 1440 out tokens · 28666 ms · 2026-05-24T10:54:38.257198+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We describe a mathematical formalism for a (D_τ,D_x)-dimensional manifold with N-correlators of N_t types of objects, with cross correlations and contaminants... using simple notions of mathematical physics, field theory, topology, algebra, statistics n-correlators and Fourier transform.

  • Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    ds²_{(Dτ,Dx)} = a²(τ) [−e^{2Ψ} Σ(dτ_b)² + e^{-2Φ} Σ dx_i dx_j δ_{ij}] (Eq. 2.2); NPCF F^{(N)}(τ,x_1…x_{N−1}) ≡ E[O(τ,s)·O(τ,s+x_1)…]

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages · 28 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Guth, A. H. Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness prob- lems. Phys. Rev. D , 23:347–356, 1981

    work page 1981

  2. [2]

    Linde, A. D. A new inflationary universe scenario: A possible solution of the horizon, flatness, homogeneity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems.Physics Letters B , 108:389–393, 1982

    work page 1982

  3. [3]

    Guth, A. H. and S.-Y. Pi. Fluctuations in the new inflationary universe. Phys. Rev. Lett., 49:1110–1113, 1982

    work page 1982

  4. [4]

    Starobinsky, A. A. Dynamics of phase transition in the new inflationary universe scenario and generation of perturbations.Physics Letters B , 117:175–178, 1982

    work page 1982

  5. [5]

    Bardeen, J. M., P. J. Steinhardt, and M. S. Turner. Spontaneous creation of almost scale-free density perturbations in an inflationary universe. Phys. Rev. D , 28:679–693, 1983. – 20 –

    work page 1983

  6. [6]

    Hard Art of the Universe Creation

    Linde, A. Stochastic approach to tunneling and baby universe formation.Nuclear Physics B, 372:421–442, 1992. arXiv:hep-th/hep-th/9110037

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  7. [7]

    Strings, Textures, Inflation and Spectrum Bending

    Linde, A. Strings, textures, inflation and spectrum bending. Physics Letters B , 284: 215–222, 1992. arXiv:hep-ph/hep-ph/9203214

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  8. [8]

    The abundance of high-redshift objects as a probe of non-Gaussian initial conditions

    Matarrese, S., L. Verde, and R. Jimenez. The Abundance of High-Redshift Objects as a Probe of Non-Gaussian Initial Conditions. Astrophysical Journal, 541:10–24, 2000. arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0001366

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  9. [9]

    Komatsu, E. and D. N. Spergel. Acoustic signatures in the primary mi- crowave background bispectrum. Physical Review D , 63:063002, 2001. arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0005036

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  10. [10]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, et al. Planck 2018 re- sults. VI. Cosmological parameters. Astronomy and Astrophysics , 641:A6, 2020. arXiv:astro-ph.CO/1807.06209

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  11. [11]

    Optimal Constraints on Local Primordial Non-Gaussianity from the Two-Point Statistics of Large-Scale Structure

    Hamaus, N., U. Seljak, and V. Desjacques. Optimal constraints on local primordial non- Gaussianity from the two-point statistics of large-scale structure.Physical Review D, 84: 083509, 2011. arXiv:astro-ph.CO/1104.2321

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  12. [12]

    Hirata, U

    Slosar, A., C. Hirata, U. Seljak, et al. Constraints on local primordial non-Gaussianity from large scale structure. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , 2008:031,

    work page 2008

  13. [13]

    arXiv:astro-ph/0805.3580

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    Matarrese, S. and L. Verde. The Effect of Primordial Non-Gaussianity on Halo Bias. Astrophysical Journal, Letters, 677:L77, 2008. arXiv:astro-ph/0801.4826

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  15. [15]

    Dalal, N., O. Doré, D. Huterer, et al. Imprints of primordial non-Gaussianities on large-scale structure: Scale-dependent bias and abundance of virialized objects.Physical Review D, 77:123514, 2008. arXiv:astro-ph/0710.4560

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  16. [16]

    Castorina, E., N. Hand, U. Seljak, et al. Redshift-weighted constraints on primordial non- Gaussianity from the clustering of the eBOSS DR14 quasars in Fourier space.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2019:010, 2019.arXiv:astro-ph.CO/1904.08859

    work page arXiv 2019

  17. [17]

    Planck 2018 results. IX. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity

    Planck Collaboration, Y. Akrami, F. Arroja, et al. Planck 2018 results. IX. Con- straints on primordial non-Gaussianity. Astronomy and Astrophysics , 641:A9, 2020. arXiv:astro-ph.CO/1905.05697

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  18. [18]

    Kirby, E. N., P. Guhathakurta, S. M. Faber, et al. The DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey: Redshift Identification of Single-Line Emission Galaxies. Astrophysical Journal, 660: 62–71, 2007. arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0701747

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  19. [19]

    Pullen, A. R., C. M. Hirata, O. Doré, et al. Interloper bias in future large-scale structure surveys. 2016. arXiv:astro-ph.CO/1507.05092

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  20. [20]

    Filtering interlopers from galaxy surveys

    Wong, K., A. Pullen, and S. Ho. Filtering interlopers from galaxy surveys.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:1606.08864, 2016. arXiv:astro-ph.IM/1606.08864. – 21 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  21. [21]

    Addison, G. E., C. L. Bennett, D. Jeong, et al. The Impact of Line Misidentification on Cosmological Constraints from Euclid and Other Spectroscopic Galaxy Surveys.Astro- physical Journal, 879:15, 2019. arXiv:astro-ph.CO/1811.10668

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  22. [22]

    Grasshorn Gebhardt, H. S., D. Jeong, H. Awan, et al. Unbiased Cosmological Parameter Estimation from Emission-line Surveys with Interlopers.Astrophysical Journal, 876:32,

    work page

  23. [23]

    arXiv:astro-ph.CO/1811.06982

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [24]

    Massara, E., S. Ho, C. M. Hirata, et al. Line confusion in spectroscopic surveys and its possible effects: Shifts in Baryon Acoustic Oscillations position.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2010.00047, 2020. arXiv:astro-ph.CO/2010.00047

    work page arXiv 2010

  25. [25]

    Fonseca, J. and S. Camera. High-redshift cosmology with oxygen lines from Hα surveys. Monthly Notices of the RAS , 495:1340–1348, 2020. arXiv:astro-ph.CO/2001.04473

    work page arXiv 2020

  26. [26]

    Garrett-Roe, S. and P. Hamm. Three-point frequency fluctuation correlation functions of the oh stretch in liquid water.The Journal of Chemical Physics , 128:104507, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2883660

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2883660 2008

  27. [27]

    Berryman, J. G. Interpolating and integrating three-point correlation functions on a lattice. Journal of Computational Physics , 75:86–102, 1988

    work page 1988

  28. [28]

    Three-pointcorrelationfunctionsoftheminimalconformaltheoriescoupled to 2d gravity.Modern Physics Letters A , 06:3601–3612, 1991

    Dotsenko, V. Three-pointcorrelationfunctionsoftheminimalconformaltheoriescoupled to 2d gravity.Modern Physics Letters A , 06:3601–3612, 1991

    work page 1991

  29. [29]

    Schmittmann, and R

    Hwang, K., B. Schmittmann, and R. K. P. Zia. Three-point correlation functions in uniformly and randomly driven diffusive systems.Phys. Rev. E , 48:800–809, 1993

    work page 1993

  30. [30]

    Šanda, F. c. v. and S. Mukamel. Multipoint correlation functions for continuous-time random walk models of anomalous diffusion.Phys. Rev. E , 72:031108, 2005

    work page 2005

  31. [31]

    Peskin, M. E. and D. V. Schroeder.An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory . Westview Press, 1995. Reading, USA: Addison-Wesley (1995) 842 p

    work page 1995

  32. [32]

    Philcox, O. H. E., Z. Slepian, J. Hou, et al. ENCORE: An {O}(N_g(2)) Estima- tor for Galaxy N-Point Correlation Functions. Monthly Notices of the RAS , 2021. arXiv:astro-ph.IM/2105.08722

    work page arXiv 2021

  33. [33]

    Philcox, O. H. E. and Z. Slepian. Efficient Computation of N-point Correla- tion Functions in D Dimensions. arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:2106.10278, 2021. arXiv:astro-ph.IM/2106.10278

    work page arXiv 2021

  34. [34]

    Fast Algorithms and Efficient Statistics: N-point Correlation Functions

    Moore, A.W., A.J.Connolly, C.Genovese, etal. FastAlgorithmsandEfficientStatistics: N-PointCorrelationFunctions. InBanday, A.J., S.Zaroubi, andM.Bartelmann, editors, Mining the Sky , page 71, 2001,arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0012333

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  35. [35]

    Functors of actions

    Ntelis, P. Functors of actions. arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:2010.06707, 2020. arXiv:physics.gen-ph/2010.06707

    work page arXiv 2010

  36. [36]

    Euclid Definition Study Report

    Laureijs, R., J. Amiaux, S. Arduini, et al. Euclid Definition Study Report.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:1110.3193, 2011. arXiv:astro-ph.CO/1110.3193. – 22 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  37. [37]

    The DESI Experiment Part I: Science,Targeting, and Survey Design

    DESI Collaboration et al. The DESI Experiment Part I: Science,Targeting, and Survey Design. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:1611.00036, 2016.arXiv:astro-ph.IM/1611.00036

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  38. [38]

    Scientific Synergy Between LSST and Euclid

    Rhodes, J., , et al. Scientific Synergy between LSST and Euclid.Astrophysical Journal, Supplement, 233:21, 2017. arXiv:astro-ph.IM/1710.08489

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  39. [39]

    Abbott, B. P. et al. Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116:061102, 2016

    work page 2016

  40. [40]

    Maggiore, M. et al. Science case for the Einstein telescope.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2020:050, 2020. arXiv:astro-ph.CO/1912.02622

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  41. [41]

    Generalised manifold-metric pairs.In preparation, 2023

    Ntelis, P. Generalised manifold-metric pairs.In preparation, 2023

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    Aprobabilistic expanding Universe ! In preparation, 2022

    Ntelis, P. Aprobabilistic expanding Universe ! In preparation, 2022

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    The Twins Embedding of Type Ia Supernovae

    Boone, K., , et al. The Twins Embedding of Type Ia Supernovae. II. Im- proving Cosmological Distance Estimates. Astrophysical Journal , 912:71, 2021. arXiv:astro-ph.CO/2105.02204

    work page arXiv 2021

  44. [44]

    Ma, C.-P. and E. Bertschinger. Cosmological Perturbation Theory in the Syn- chronous and Conformal Newtonian Gauges. Astrophysical Journal , 455:7, 1995. arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/9506072

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  45. [45]

    Blanton, M. R. et al. Sloan Digital Sky Survey IV: Mapping the Milky Way, Nearby Galaxies, and the Distant Universe. Astronomical Journal , 154:28, 2017. arXiv:astro-ph.GA/1703.00052

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  46. [46]

    Karaçaylı, N., N

    G. Karaçaylı, N., N. Padmanabhan, Font-Ribera, et al. Optimal 1D Ly α Forest Power Spectrum Estimation – II. KODIAQ, SQUAD & XQ-100.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2108.10870, 2021. arXiv:astro-ph.CO/2108.10870

    work page arXiv 2021

  47. [48]

    arXiv:astro-ph.CO/2007.13791

    work page arXiv 2007

  48. [49]

    Lewis, A. and A. Challinor. Weak gravitational lensing of the CMB.Physics Reports, 429:1–65, 2006. arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0601594

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  49. [50]

    Sherwin, B. D. and M. Schmittfull. Delensing the CMB with the CIB.Physical Review D, 92:043005, 2015. arXiv:astro-ph.CO/1502.05356

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  50. [51]

    Aghanim, C

    Ilić, S., N. Aghanim, C. Baccigalupi, et al.Euclid preparation: XV. Forecasting cos- mological constraints for the Euclid and CMB joint analysis. arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:2106.08346, 2021. arXiv:astro-ph.CO/2106.08346

    work page arXiv 2021

  51. [52]

    Lahav, O., P. B. Lilje, J. R. Primack, et al. Dynamical effects of the cosmological constant. Monthly Notices of the RAS , 251:128–136, 1991

    work page 1991

  52. [53]

    Linder, E. V. and R. N. Cahn. Parameterized beyond-einstein growth. Astroparticle Physics, 28:481–488, 2007. arXiv:astro-ph/0701317v2. – 23 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  53. [54]

    Perez, F. and B. E. Granger. Ipython: A system for interactive scientific computing. Computing in Science Engineering , 9:21–29, 2007

    work page 2007

  54. [55]

    Hunter, J. D. Matplotlib: A 2d graphics environment.Computing in Science & Engi- neering, 9:90–95, 2007

    work page 2007

  55. [56]

    Walt, S. v. d., S. C. Colbert, and G. Varoquaux. The numpy array: A structure for efficient numerical computation.Computing in Science and Engg. , 13:22–30, 2011

    work page 2011

  56. [57]

    SciPy 1.0--Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python

    Virtanen, P., R. Gommers, T. E. Oliphant, et al. SciPy 1.0–Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python. arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:1907.10121, 2019. arXiv:cs.MS/1907.10121

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1907

  57. [58]

    James, F. and M. Roos. Minuit: A System for Function Minimization and Analysis of the Parameter Errors and Correlations.Comput. Phys. Commun. , 10:343–367, 1975

    work page 1975

  58. [59]

    Hamilton, J.-M

    Ntelis, P., J.-C. Hamilton, J.-M. Le Goff, et al. Exploring cosmic homogeneity with the BOSS DR12 galaxy sample.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , 2017:019,

    work page 2017

  59. [60]

    arXiv:astro-ph.CO/1702.02159

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  60. [61]

    The scale of cosmic homogeneity as a standard ruler

    Ntelis, P., A. Ealet, S. Escoffier, et al. The scale of cosmic homogeneity as a standard ruler. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , 2018:014, 2018. arXiv:astro-ph.CO/1810.09362. A Statements & declarations A.1 Funding The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the prepa- ration of this manuscript. A.2 Compe...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018