Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

From Risk Sets to Martingales: A Counting-Process Framework for Event-History Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.07114 v5 pith:JVM45XLL submitted 2022-09-30 stat.AP math.PRmath.STstat.MEstat.TH

classification stat.APmath.PRmath.STstat.MEstat.TH
keywords survivalcensoredcompensatordataevent-historyframeworklearningmethods
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Counting-process notation separates predictable risk-set information from observed event jumps through decompositions of the form dN(t)=Y(t)alpha(t)dt+dM(t). This article develops a unified event-history learning framework for censored, truncated, recurrent, multistate, and covariate-dependent data. Rather than cataloguing survival methods, the treatment translates each partially observed learning target into five recurring objects: risk process, jump process, compensator, estimating equation, and limiting argument. The framework connects right-censored survival curves, product-integral estimators, bivariate and interval-censored survival estimators, log-rank tests, Cox-Andersen-Gill regression, additive hazards, accelerated failure-time models, panel-count data, landmark prediction, semi-Markov models, Bayesian nonparametric transition models, and instrumental-variable methods. The original contribution is threefold. Computationally, the article turns risk-set sweeps, product-integral updates, interval-likelihood calculations, semi-Markov elapsed-time bookkeeping, Bayesian transition-hazard updating, and cross-fitted validation into reusable algorithms and simulation diagnostics. Theoretically, it gives proof templates for the recurring martingale, likelihood, product-integral, and empirical-process arguments, and proves a new out-of-fold compensator validation identity for cross-fitted censored learners. For applications, it maps biomedical, reliability, operational, economic, financial, literary, historical, and causal survival examples onto the same risk-set and compensator language. The resulting account provides a common mathematical language for deriving, checking, and comparing classical and machine-learning methods for censored, recurrent, and multistate event-history data.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Markov Renewal Proportional Hazards is All You Need

    stat.AP 2025-01 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A mostly tutorial and application paper claims semi-Markov models with the DSH estimator produce smoother transition probability curves than Aalen-Johansen in the EBMT stem cell transplant data, without quantitative v...

Pith tools