Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Resolving the Mixing Time of the Langevin Algorithm to its Stationary Distribution for Log-Concave Sampling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.08448 v2 pith:K2TSL4S4 submitted 2022-10-16 math.ST math.OCmath.PRstat.MLstat.TH

classification math.STmath.OCmath.PRstat.MLstat.TH
keywords langevinmixingalgorithmsamplingapproachdistributiongradientstationary
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Sampling from a high-dimensional distribution is a fundamental task in statistics, engineering, and the sciences. A canonical approach is the Langevin Algorithm, i.e., the Markov chain for the discretized Langevin Diffusion. This is the sampling analog of Gradient Descent. Despite being studied for several decades in multiple communities, tight mixing bounds for this algorithm remain unresolved even in the seemingly simple setting of log-concave distributions over a bounded domain. This paper completely characterizes the mixing time of the Langevin Algorithm to its stationary distribution in this setting (and others). This mixing result can be combined with any bound on the discretization bias in order to sample from the stationary distribution of the continuous Langevin Diffusion. In this way, we disentangle the study of the mixing and bias of the Langevin Algorithm. Our key insight is to introduce a technique from the differential privacy literature to the sampling literature. This technique, called Privacy Amplification by Iteration, uses as a potential a variant of R\'enyi divergence that is made geometrically aware via Optimal Transport smoothing. This gives a short, simple proof of optimal mixing bounds and has several additional appealing properties. First, our approach removes all unnecessary assumptions required by other sampling analyses. Second, our approach unifies many settings: it extends unchanged if the Langevin Algorithm uses projections, stochastic mini-batch gradients, or strongly convex potentials (whereby our mixing time improves exponentially). Third, our approach exploits convexity only through the contractivity of a gradient step -- reminiscent of how convexity is used in textbook proofs of Gradient Descent. In this way, we offer a new approach towards further unifying the analyses of optimization and sampling algorithms.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Sampling and Optimization meet Enhanced Flows

    math.OC 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    New first- and second-order transport-diffusion dynamics with deterministic alternating shear flows converge to a given Gibbs measure at an enhanced O(ν^{1/2}) rate, faster than classical Langevin sampling at O(ν).

Pith tools