Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Exploring Video Quality Assessment on User Generated Contents from Aesthetic and Technical Perspectives

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.04894 v3 pith:E4CSSS5V submitted 2022-11-09 cs.CV cs.LGcs.MMeess.IV

classification cs.CVcs.LGcs.MMeess.IV
keywords qualityperspectivesaesthetictechnicaldoveropinionsperspectivevideo
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The rapid increase in user-generated-content (UGC) videos calls for the development of effective video quality assessment (VQA) algorithms. However, the objective of the UGC-VQA problem is still ambiguous and can be viewed from two perspectives: the technical perspective, measuring the perception of distortions; and the aesthetic perspective, which relates to preference and recommendation on contents. To understand how these two perspectives affect overall subjective opinions in UGC-VQA, we conduct a large-scale subjective study to collect human quality opinions on overall quality of videos as well as perceptions from aesthetic and technical perspectives. The collected Disentangled Video Quality Database (DIVIDE-3k) confirms that human quality opinions on UGC videos are universally and inevitably affected by both aesthetic and technical perspectives. In light of this, we propose the Disentangled Objective Video Quality Evaluator (DOVER) to learn the quality of UGC videos based on the two perspectives. The DOVER proves state-of-the-art performance in UGC-VQA under very high efficiency. With perspective opinions in DIVIDE-3k, we further propose DOVER++, the first approach to provide reliable clear-cut quality evaluations from a single aesthetic or technical perspective. Code at https://github.com/VQAssessment/DOVER.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. muSync-GS: Physics-Synchronized Driving Video Synthesis for Weather and Geometric Road Hazards

    cs.CV 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    muSync-GS couples weather and road-shape edits in driving videos to a calibrated vehicle-dynamics model, so the synthesized ego motion and telemetry change with the same controls that drive the visual edits.

  2. OmniHuman: A Large-scale Dataset and Benchmark for Human-Centric Video Generation

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    OmniHuman is a new large-scale multi-scene dataset with video-, frame-, and individual-level annotations for human-centric video generation, accompanied by the OHBench benchmark that adds metrics aligned with human pe...

  3. LEHA-CVQAD: Dataset To Enable Generalized Video Quality Assessment of Compression Artifacts

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LEHA-CVQAD is a 6,240-clip compressed video dataset with fused MOS and pairwise labels, a hidden test set, and a new Rate-Distortion Alignment Error metric.

  4. AIGVE-MACS: Unified Multi-Aspect Commenting and Scoring Model for AI-Generated Video Evaluation

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A finetuned vision-language model jointly predicts nine aspect scores and written comments for AI-generated videos, with a new benchmark and claims of state-of-the-art alignment with human judgment.

  5. EyeSim-VQA: A Free-Energy-Guided Eye Simulation Framework for Video Quality Assessment

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A VQA model that combines free-energy-inspired frame restoration with a scan-and-gaze prediction head reports competitive results on five benchmarks, though the claimed state-of-the-art performance is not uniformly supported.

Pith tools