Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Hierarchical Programmatic Reinforcement Learning via Learning to Compose Programs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.12950 v2 pith:PPLPO3FV submitted 2023-01-30 cs.LG cs.AIcs.PLcs.RO

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.PLcs.RO
keywords programprogramslearningleapsembeddingpoliciesproducereinforcement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Aiming to produce reinforcement learning (RL) policies that are human-interpretable and can generalize better to novel scenarios, Trivedi et al. (2021) present a method (LEAPS) that first learns a program embedding space to continuously parameterize diverse programs from a pre-generated program dataset, and then searches for a task-solving program in the learned program embedding space when given a task. Despite the encouraging results, the program policies that LEAPS can produce are limited by the distribution of the program dataset. Furthermore, during searching, LEAPS evaluates each candidate program solely based on its return, failing to precisely reward correct parts of programs and penalize incorrect parts. To address these issues, we propose to learn a meta-policy that composes a series of programs sampled from the learned program embedding space. By learning to compose programs, our proposed hierarchical programmatic reinforcement learning (HPRL) framework can produce program policies that describe out-of-distributionally complex behaviors and directly assign credits to programs that induce desired behaviors. The experimental results in the Karel domain show that our proposed framework outperforms baselines. The ablation studies confirm the limitations of LEAPS and justify our design choices.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SMOSE: Sparse Mixture of Shallow Experts for Interpretable Reinforcement Learning in Continuous Control Tasks

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A sparse top-1 mixture of linear experts, trained with SAC and distilled into decision trees, matches or beats interpretable baselines and narrows the gap to opaque policies on MuJoCo tasks.

Pith tools