Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

PLACES: Prompting Language Models for Social Conversation Synthesis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.03269 v3 pith:DBA4UKTH submitted 2023-02-07 cs.CL cs.AIcs.IR

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.IR
keywords conversationsconversationmulti-partypromptingsyntheticdatasetcompareddata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Collecting high quality conversational data can be very expensive for most applications and infeasible for others due to privacy, ethical, or similar concerns. A promising direction to tackle this problem is to generate synthetic dialogues by prompting large language models. In this work, we use a small set of expert-written conversations as in-context examples to synthesize a social conversation dataset using prompting. We perform several thorough evaluations of our synthetic conversations compared to human-collected conversations. This includes various dimensions of conversation quality with human evaluation directly on the synthesized conversations, and interactive human evaluation of chatbots fine-tuned on the synthetically generated dataset. We additionally demonstrate that this prompting approach is generalizable to multi-party conversations, providing potential to create new synthetic data for multi-party tasks. Our synthetic multi-party conversations were rated more favorably across all measured dimensions compared to conversation excerpts sampled from a human-collected multi-party dataset.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Simple Prompt Injection Attacks Can Leak Personal Data Observed by LLM Agents During Task Execution

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Prompt injection can make LLM agents leak personal data they observed while executing tasks, with measured attack success rates around 15-20 percent and password leakage much rarer.

Pith tools