REVIEW 2 cited by
Targeted Attack on GPT-Neo for the SATML Language Model Data Extraction Challenge
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Previous work has shown that Large Language Models are susceptible to so-called data extraction attacks. This allows an attacker to extract a sample that was contained in the training data, which has massive privacy implications. The construction of data extraction attacks is challenging, current attacks are quite inefficient, and there exists a significant gap in the extraction capabilities of untargeted attacks and memorization. Thus, targeted attacks are proposed, which identify if a given sample from the training data, is extractable from a model. In this work, we apply a targeted data extraction attack to the SATML2023 Language Model Training Data Extraction Challenge. We apply a two-step approach. In the first step, we maximise the recall of the model and are able to extract the suffix for 69% of the samples. In the second step, we use a classifier-based Membership Inference Attack on the generations. Our AutoSklearn classifier achieves a precision of 0.841. The full approach reaches a score of 0.405 recall at a 10% false positive rate, which is an improvement of 34% over the baseline of 0.301.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
The Poisoned Chalice of LLM Evaluation Report
A competition report showing that white-box membership inference attacks on code LLMs mostly fail (AUC ~0.56–0.61) except for one structure-aware method (SERSEM, AUC ~0.77) that generalizes to a held-out model.
-
LLM Security: Vulnerabilities, Attacks, Defenses, and Countermeasures
This survey categorizes attacks on large language models by lifecycle phase and maps them to prevention and detection defenses, concluding that only a few defenses are highly effective.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.