Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Where are we in the search for an Artificial Visual Cortex for Embodied Intelligence?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.18240 v2 pith:IN6MR7VH submitted 2023-03-31 cs.CV cs.AIcs.LGcs.RO

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.LGcs.RO
keywords vc-1pvrsprioruniversallyvisualadaptedaveragecortexbench
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present the largest and most comprehensive empirical study of pre-trained visual representations (PVRs) or visual 'foundation models' for Embodied AI. First, we curate CortexBench, consisting of 17 different tasks spanning locomotion, navigation, dexterous, and mobile manipulation. Next, we systematically evaluate existing PVRs and find that none are universally dominant. To study the effect of pre-training data size and diversity, we combine over 4,000 hours of egocentric videos from 7 different sources (over 4.3M images) and ImageNet to train different-sized vision transformers using Masked Auto-Encoding (MAE) on slices of this data. Contrary to inferences from prior work, we find that scaling dataset size and diversity does not improve performance universally (but does so on average). Our largest model, named VC-1, outperforms all prior PVRs on average but does not universally dominate either. Next, we show that task- or domain-specific adaptation of VC-1 leads to substantial gains, with VC-1 (adapted) achieving competitive or superior performance than the best known results on all of the benchmarks in CortexBench. Finally, we present real-world hardware experiments, in which VC-1 and VC-1 (adapted) outperform the strongest pre-existing PVR. Overall, this paper presents no new techniques but a rigorous systematic evaluation, a broad set of findings about PVRs (that in some cases, refute those made in narrow domains in prior work), and open-sourced code and models (that required over 10,000 GPU-hours to train) for the benefit of the research community.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. VLAff: Vision-Language-Affordance Model for Unified Actionable Affordances

    cs.RO 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    From 204K egocentric human videos, the authors automatically extract visual, grasp, and trajectory affordances and train one vision-language model, VLAff, that predicts all three for robot manipulation.

  2. Weights or Skills? A Survey of Robot-Learning Techniques: from Action-Predicting Weights to Robots that Write their Own Skills

    cs.RO 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A taxonomy of robot learning on a weights-versus-skills axis, with a five-rung self-improvement ladder whose top cell (feedback plus memory plus search) holds only a few recent systems.

  3. Spotlighting Task-Relevant Features: Object-Centric Representations for Better Generalization in Robotic Manipulation

    cs.RO 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Slot-based object-centric visual representations, especially with robot-video pretraining, improve out-of-distribution generalization of robotic manipulation policies compared to global and dense pre-trained features.

  4. Self-Supervised Multisensory Pretraining for Contact-Rich Robot Reinforcement Learning

    cs.RO 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    MSDP pre-trains a transformer encoder with masked multisensory autoencoding, then uses an asymmetric actor-critic bridge (cross-attention for critic, pooling for actor) to accelerate and robustify contact-rich RL acro...

  5. Is an object-centric representation beneficial for robotic manipulation ?

    cs.AI 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Evaluating the object-centric SAVi encoder against the global DINO and R3M representations on three simulated manipulation tasks, the authors find SAVi is the only model to solve the pick task and is more robust to un...

Pith tools