Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Random Reed-Solomon Codes Achieve List-Decoding Capacity With Linear-Sized Alphabets

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.09445 v6 pith:NU6DTDT3 submitted 2023-04-19 cs.IT cs.DSmath.COmath.IT

classification cs.ITcs.DSmath.COmath.IT
keywords codescapacityreed-solomonlist-decodingsizefieldlinearoptimal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Reed-Solomon codes are a classic family of error-correcting codes consisting of evaluations of low-degree polynomials over a finite field on some sequence of distinct field elements. They are widely known for their optimal unique-decoding capabilities, but their list-decoding capabilities are not fully understood. Given the prevalence of Reed-Solomon codes, a fundamental question in coding theory is determining if Reed-Solomon codes can optimally achieve list-decoding capacity. A recent breakthrough by Brakensiek, Gopi, and Makam established that Reed-Solomon codes are combinatorially list-decodable all the way to capacity. However, their results hold for randomly-punctured Reed-Solomon codes over an exponentially large field size $2^{O(n)}$, where $n$ is the block length of the code. A natural question is whether Reed-Solomon codes can still achieve capacity over smaller fields. We show that Reed-Solomon codes are list-decodable to capacity with linear field size $O(n)$, which is evidently optimal up to a constant factor. Our techniques also show that random linear codes are list-decodable up to capacity with optimal list-size $O(1/\varepsilon)$ and near-optimal alphabet size $2^{O(1/\varepsilon^2)}$, where $\varepsilon$ is the gap to capacity. As far as we are aware, list-decoding up to capacity with optimal list-size $O(1/\varepsilon)$ was not known to be achievable with any linear code over a constant alphabet size (even non-constructively), and it was also not known to be achievable for random linear codes over any alphabet size. With our proof, which maintains a hypergraph perspective of the list-decoding problem, we include an alternate presentation of ideas from Brakensiek, Gopi, and Makam that more directly connects the list-decoding problem to the GM-MDS theorem via a hypergraph orientation theorem.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. List Decoding Expander-Based Codes up to Capacity in Near-Linear Time

    cs.DS 2025-04 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    Near-linear-time list decoding and list recovery up to capacity are achieved for expander-based AEL and Tanner codes using a graph-regularity rigidity framework.

  2. Explicit Codes approaching Generalized Singleton Bound using Expanders

    cs.IT 2025-02 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    AEL expander amplification is shown to preserve a strengthened average-radius list decoding property with erasures, yielding explicit codes with constant alphabet and optimal list size near the generalized Singleton bound.

Pith tools