Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Automated Mapping of CVE Vulnerability Records to MITRE CWE Weaknesses

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.11130 v1 pith:ABHMRSE7 submitted 2023-04-13 cs.CR cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
keywords beenlearningmitrerecordstaskformatsmanuallymapping
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In recent years, a proliferation of cyber-security threats and diversity has been on the rise culminating in an increase in their reporting and analysis. To counter that, many non-profit organizations have emerged in this domain, such as MITRE and OSWAP, which have been actively tracking vulnerabilities, and publishing defense recommendations in standardized formats. As producing data in such formats manually is very time-consuming, there have been some proposals to automate the process. Unfortunately, a major obstacle to adopting supervised machine learning for this problem has been the lack of publicly available specialized datasets. Here, we aim to bridge this gap. In particular, we focus on mapping CVE records into MITRE CWE Weaknesses, and we release to the research community a manually annotated dataset of 4,012 records for this task. With a human-in-the-loop framework in mind, we approach the problem as a ranking task and aim to incorporate reinforced learning to make use of the human feedback in future work. Our experimental results using fine-tuned deep learning models, namely Sentence-BERT and rankT5, show sizable performance gains over BM25, BERT, and RoBERTa, which demonstrates the need for an architecture capable of good semantic understanding for this task.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Labeling NIDS Rules with MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: Machine Learning vs. Large Language Models

    cs.CR 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    On a dataset of 973 Snort rules, traditional ML models (SVM, F1 up to 0.87) outperformed ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini (best F1 0.62) at labeling rules with MITRE ATT&CK techniques.

Pith tools