Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Building Accurate Low Latency ASR for Streaming Voice Search

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.18596 v1 pith:JGHCPFZR submitted 2023-05-29 cs.SD cs.CLcs.LGeess.AS

classification cs.SDcs.CLcs.LGeess.AS
keywords streamingsearchvoiceapplicationsmodeldetectionlstmmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) plays a crucial role in voice-based applications. For applications requiring real-time feedback like Voice Search, streaming capability becomes vital. While LSTM/RNN and CTC based ASR systems are commonly employed for low-latency streaming applications, they often exhibit lower accuracy compared to state-of-the-art models due to a lack of future audio frames. In this work, we focus on developing accurate LSTM, attention, and CTC based streaming ASR models for large-scale Hinglish (a blend of Hindi and English) Voice Search. We investigate various modifications in vanilla LSTM training which enhance the system's accuracy while preserving its streaming capabilities. We also address the critical requirement of end-of-speech (EOS) detection in streaming applications. We present a simple training and inference strategy for end-to-end CTC models that enables joint ASR and EOS detection. The evaluation of our model on Flipkart's Voice Search, which handles substantial traffic of approximately 6 million queries per day, demonstrates significant performance gains over the vanilla LSTM-CTC model. Our model achieves a word error rate (WER) of 3.69% without EOS and 4.78% with EOS while also reducing the search latency by approximately ~1300 ms (equivalent to 46.64% reduction) when compared to an independent voice activity detection (VAD) model.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools