REVIEW 1 cited by
TASRA: a Taxonomy and Analysis of Societal-Scale Risks from AI
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
While several recent works have identified societal-scale and extinction-level risks to humanity arising from artificial intelligence, few have attempted an {\em exhaustive taxonomy} of such risks. Many exhaustive taxonomies are possible, and some are useful -- particularly if they reveal new risks or practical approaches to safety. This paper explores a taxonomy based on accountability: whose actions lead to the risk, are the actors unified, and are they deliberate? We also provide stories to illustrate how the various risk types could each play out, including risks arising from unanticipated interactions of many AI systems, as well as risks from deliberate misuse, for which combined technical and policy solutions are indicated.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A Taxonomy of Omnicidal Futures Involving Artificial Intelligence
A conceptual taxonomy dividing AI-driven omnicide into unintentional, intentional-by-state, intentional-by-institution, intentional-by-individual, and intentional-by-AI scenarios.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.