Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

MagicBrush: A Manually Annotated Dataset for Instruction-Guided Image Editing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.10012 v3 pith:4I3X4GDX submitted 2023-06-16 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.CL
keywords editingimagemagicbrushdatasetannotatedmanuallybaselinescurrent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Text-guided image editing is widely needed in daily life, ranging from personal use to professional applications such as Photoshop. However, existing methods are either zero-shot or trained on an automatically synthesized dataset, which contains a high volume of noise. Thus, they still require lots of manual tuning to produce desirable outcomes in practice. To address this issue, we introduce MagicBrush (https://osu-nlp-group.github.io/MagicBrush/), the first large-scale, manually annotated dataset for instruction-guided real image editing that covers diverse scenarios: single-turn, multi-turn, mask-provided, and mask-free editing. MagicBrush comprises over 10K manually annotated triplets (source image, instruction, target image), which supports trainining large-scale text-guided image editing models. We fine-tune InstructPix2Pix on MagicBrush and show that the new model can produce much better images according to human evaluation. We further conduct extensive experiments to evaluate current image editing baselines from multiple dimensions including quantitative, qualitative, and human evaluations. The results reveal the challenging nature of our dataset and the gap between current baselines and real-world editing needs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. EditInspector: A Benchmark for Evaluation of Text-Guided Image Edits

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new human-labeled benchmark shows leading vision-language models are unreliable at judging image edits, and the authors' methods improve artifact detection and difference captioning.

  2. Mage-Flow: An Efficient Native-Resolution Foundation Model for Image Generation and Editing

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A compact 4B image generation/editing system with a fast one-step VAE, native-resolution packing, RL alignment, and 4-step distillation reports competitive benchmarks against 6B–80B open models.

Pith tools