REVIEW 3 cited by
Why Shallow Networks Struggle to Approximate and Learn High Frequencies
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In this work, we present a comprehensive study combining mathematical and computational analysis to explain why a two-layer neural network struggles to handle high frequencies in both approximation and learning, especially when machine precision, numerical noise, and computational cost are significant factors in practice. Specifically, we investigate the following fundamental computational issues: (1) the minimal numerical error achievable under finite precision, (2) the computational cost required to attain a given accuracy, and (3) the stability of the method with respect to perturbations. The core of our analysis lies in the conditioning of the representation and its learning dynamics. Explicit answers to these questions are provided, along with supporting numerical evidence.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Second-Order Path Kernel Interpolation Formulas in Machine Learning
Derives second-order path-kernel interpolation formulas for gradient descent, SGD, and momentum training, adding curvature terms and a concentration estimate around the expected prediction.
-
Orthogonal greedy algorithm for linear operator learning with shallow neural network
Orthogonal greedy training of shallow ReLU networks is adapted to kernel estimation for linear operators, with stated convergence rates and large accuracy gains over neural operator baselines.
-
Structured First-Layer Initialization Pre-Training Techniques to Accelerate Training Process Based on $\varepsilon$-Rank
A structured first-layer initialization raises the ε-rank of neuron functions and accelerates training of PINNs and function approximators.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.