Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

SentimentGPT: Exploiting GPT for Advanced Sentiment Analysis and its Departure from Current Machine Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.10234 v2 pith:VDJS63UX submitted 2023-07-16 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LGcs.SI

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LGcs.SI
keywords modelsanalysissentimentadvancedcontextcurrentdatasetmethodologies
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This study presents a thorough examination of various Generative Pretrained Transformer (GPT) methodologies in sentiment analysis, specifically in the context of Task 4 on the SemEval 2017 dataset. Three primary strategies are employed: 1) prompt engineering using the advanced GPT-3.5 Turbo, 2) fine-tuning GPT models, and 3) an inventive approach to embedding classification. The research yields detailed comparative insights among these strategies and individual GPT models, revealing their unique strengths and potential limitations. Additionally, the study compares these GPT-based methodologies with other current, high-performing models previously used with the same dataset. The results illustrate the significant superiority of the GPT approaches in terms of predictive performance, more than 22\% in F1-score compared to the state-of-the-art. Further, the paper sheds light on common challenges in sentiment analysis tasks, such as understanding context and detecting sarcasm. It underscores the enhanced capabilities of the GPT models to effectively handle these complexities. Taken together, these findings highlight the promising potential of GPT models in sentiment analysis, setting the stage for future research in this field. The code can be found at https://github.com/DSAatUSU/SentimentGPT

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SIExVulTS: Sensitive Information Exposure Vulnerability Detection System using Transformer Models and Static Analysis

    cs.CR 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SIExVulTS combines sentence embeddings, CodeQL dataflow queries, and GraphCodeBERT verification to detect CWE-200 sensitive-information-exposure vulnerabilities in Java, reporting an F1 of 85.71 percent on a synthetic...

  2. Adaptable Embeddings Network (AEN)

    cs.LG 2024-11 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    AEN compares a statement embedding against per-dimension kernel density estimates of condition token embeddings, reporting F1 0.74 on synthetic data with roughly 16x fewer FLOPs than a 3B-parameter LLM.

  3. Web-Browsing LLMs Can Access Social Media Profiles and Infer User Demographics

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Web-browsing LLMs can retrieve X profile content and infer demographics with above-chance accuracy in some cases, but the study's evidence is partly confounded by training-data memorization and a heavily reduced synth...

  4. Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis on Japanese Online Media's Coverage of Nuclear Energy

    cs.CL 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Japanese YouTube news coverage and comments on nuclear energy cluster into 16 topics, with an overall slightly negative sentiment that is partly a known artifact of the sentiment model's bias.

Pith tools