Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Revisiting Prompt Engineering via Declarative Crowdsourcing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.03854 v1 pith:ZZDP63AG submitted 2023-08-07 cs.DB cs.AIcs.HCcs.LG

classification cs.DBcs.AIcs.HCcs.LG
keywords promptdeclarativeengineeringprocesscrowdsourcingdatallmsadvent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are incredibly powerful at comprehending and generating data in the form of text, but are brittle and error-prone. There has been an advent of toolkits and recipes centered around so-called prompt engineering-the process of asking an LLM to do something via a series of prompts. However, for LLM-powered data processing workflows, in particular, optimizing for quality, while keeping cost bounded, is a tedious, manual process. We put forth a vision for declarative prompt engineering. We view LLMs like crowd workers and leverage ideas from the declarative crowdsourcing literature-including leveraging multiple prompting strategies, ensuring internal consistency, and exploring hybrid-LLM-non-LLM approaches-to make prompt engineering a more principled process. Preliminary case studies on sorting, entity resolution, and imputation demonstrate the promise of our approach

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. From Prompt to Pipeline: Large Language Models for Scientific Workflow Development in Bioinformatics

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A qualitative study of ten bioinformatics workflows finds LLMs can generate usable Galaxy and Nextflow pipelines, with Gemini best for Galaxy and DeepSeek-V3 best for Nextflow.

  2. Quality Control in Open-Ended Crowdsourcing: A Survey

    cs.HC 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper maps quality control techniques for crowdsourcing tasks with large or infinite answer spaces into a two-tiered framework.

Pith tools