REVIEW 4 cited by
VisIT-Bench: A Benchmark for Vision-Language Instruction Following Inspired by Real-World Use
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We introduce VisIT-Bench (Visual InsTruction Benchmark), a benchmark for evaluation of instruction-following vision-language models for real-world use. Our starting point is curating 70 'instruction families' that we envision instruction tuned vision-language models should be able to address. Extending beyond evaluations like VQAv2 and COCO, tasks range from basic recognition to game playing and creative generation. Following curation, our dataset comprises 592 test queries, each with a human-authored instruction-conditioned caption. These descriptions surface instruction-specific factors, e.g., for an instruction asking about the accessibility of a storefront for wheelchair users, the instruction-conditioned caption describes ramps/potential obstacles. These descriptions enable 1) collecting human-verified reference outputs for each instance; and 2) automatic evaluation of candidate multimodal generations using a text-only LLM, aligning with human judgment. We quantify quality gaps between models and references using both human and automatic evaluations; e.g., the top-performing instruction-following model wins against the GPT-4 reference in just 27% of the comparison. VisIT-Bench is dynamic to participate, practitioners simply submit their model's response on the project website; Data, code and leaderboard is available at visit-bench.github.io.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Inverse IFEval: Can LLMs Unlearn Stubborn Training Conventions to Follow Real Instructions?
A new 1,012-question benchmark shows LLMs often fail instructions that deliberately invert common training conventions, revealing a measurable gap in counterintuitive instruction following.
-
MM-RLHF: The Next Step Forward in Multimodal LLM Alignment
A human-annotated multimodal preference dataset plus critique-based reward modeling and reward-margin-weighted DPO improves MLLM performance across many benchmarks.
-
Breaking the Mirror: Activation-Based Mitigation of Self-Preference in LLM Evaluators
Steering vectors flip most unjustified self-preference decisions of an LLM judge but also disturb legitimate ones, showing the bias is not captured by a single linear direction.
-
MINT: Multimodal Instruction Tuning with Multimodal Interaction Grouping
Grouping instruction-tuning datasets by redundancy, uniqueness, or synergy of text-image interaction improves vision-language model accuracy over single-task and unselective multi-task tuning.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.