REVIEW 3 cited by
Efficient Benchmarking of Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The increasing versatility of language models (LMs) has given rise to a new class of benchmarks that comprehensively assess a broad range of capabilities. Such benchmarks are associated with massive computational costs, extending to thousands of GPU hours per model. However, the efficiency aspect of these evaluation efforts had raised little discussion in the literature. In this work, we present the problem of Efficient Benchmarking, namely, intelligently reducing the computation costs of LM evaluation without compromising reliability. Using the HELM benchmark as a test case, we investigate how different benchmark design choices affect the computation-reliability trade-off. We propose to evaluate the reliability of such decisions, by using a new measure -- Decision Impact on Reliability, DIoR for short. We find, for example, that a benchmark leader may change by merely removing a low-ranked model from the benchmark, and observe that a correct benchmark ranking can be obtained by considering only a fraction of the evaluation examples. Based on our findings, we outline a set of concrete recommendations for efficient benchmark design and utilization practices. To take a step further, we use our findings to propose an evaluation algorithm, that, when applied to the HELM benchmark, leads to dramatic cost savings with minimal loss of benchmark reliability, often reducing computation by x100 or more.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Metritocracy: Representative Metrics for Lite Benchmarks
Defines positional representation and positional proportionality for metric subset selection, with nearly tight worst-case bounds, greedy algorithms, and case studies on LLM and hospital benchmarks.
-
AutoJudger: An Agent-Driven Framework for Efficient Benchmarking of MLLMs
An agent-driven framework adaptively selects a small subset of benchmark questions for MLLMs, preserving over 90% ranking accuracy with roughly 4-5% of the data.
-
Capability Salience Vector: Fine-grained Alignment of Loss and Capabilities for Downstream Task Scaling Law
A fitted token-level loss weighting, optimized against known model accuracies, predicts held-out downstream task performance more accurately than mean validation loss on five of six benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.