REVIEW 3 cited by
LLM-Based Human-Robot Collaboration Framework for Manipulation Tasks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This paper presents a novel approach to enhance autonomous robotic manipulation using the Large Language Model (LLM) for logical inference, converting high-level language commands into sequences of executable motion functions. The proposed system combines the advantage of LLM with YOLO-based environmental perception to enable robots to autonomously make reasonable decisions and task planning based on the given commands. Additionally, to address the potential inaccuracies or illogical actions arising from LLM, a combination of teleoperation and Dynamic Movement Primitives (DMP) is employed for action correction. This integration aims to improve the practicality and generalizability of the LLM-based human-robot collaboration system.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Attention at Rest Stays at Rest: Breaking Visual Inertia for Cognitive Hallucination Mitigation
Visual attention in MLLMs shows inertia that hinders cognitive inference on object relations, addressed by a training-free Inertia-aware Visual Excitation method that selects dynamically emerging tokens and applies an...
-
A Call for Collaborative Intelligence: Why Human-Agent Systems Should Precede AI Autonomy
A position paper arguing that LLM-based human-agent systems, not fully autonomous agents, should be the immediate goal for AI development.
-
LA-RCS: LLM-Agent-Based Robot Control System
LA-RCS reports that a dual-agent LLM system controls a small car robot to complete 18 of 20 self-designed commands with the GPT-4o variant, but the supporting evaluation is inconsistent and not reproducible.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.