REVIEW 2 cited by
Bias and Fairness in Chatbots: An Overview
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Chatbots have been studied for more than half a century. With the rapid development of natural language processing (NLP) technologies in recent years, chatbots using large language models (LLMs) have received much attention nowadays. Compared with traditional ones, modern chatbots are more powerful and have been used in real-world applications. There are however, bias and fairness concerns in modern chatbot design. Due to the huge amounts of training data, extremely large model sizes, and lack of interpretability, bias mitigation and fairness preservation of modern chatbots are challenging. Thus, a comprehensive overview on bias and fairness in chatbot systems is given in this paper. The history of chatbots and their categories are first reviewed. Then, bias sources and potential harms in applications are analyzed. Considerations in designing fair and unbiased chatbot systems are examined. Finally, future research directions are discussed.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
When Harry Meets Superman: The Role of The Interlocutor in Persona-Based Dialogue Generation
A systematic evaluation shows that masking the interlocutor's persona lowers target speaker identification accuracy, and that zero-shot models often copy biography details, making identification easier but dialogues m...
-
Toward Inclusive Educational AI: Auditing Frontier LLMs through a Multiplexity Lens
Multi-agent prompting makes LLM answers mention a roughly equal share of eight cultures, but the measurement and the multi-agent design make the reported 98% balance largely self-fulfilling.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.