REVIEW 2 cited by
FoleyGen: Visually-Guided Audio Generation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recent advancements in audio generation have been spurred by the evolution of large-scale deep learning models and expansive datasets. However, the task of video-to-audio (V2A) generation continues to be a challenge, principally because of the intricate relationship between the high-dimensional visual and auditory data, and the challenges associated with temporal synchronization. In this study, we introduce FoleyGen, an open-domain V2A generation system built on a language modeling paradigm. FoleyGen leverages an off-the-shelf neural audio codec for bidirectional conversion between waveforms and discrete tokens. The generation of audio tokens is facilitated by a single Transformer model, which is conditioned on visual features extracted from a visual encoder. A prevalent problem in V2A generation is the misalignment of generated audio with the visible actions in the video. To address this, we explore three novel visual attention mechanisms. We further undertake an exhaustive evaluation of multiple visual encoders, each pretrained on either single-modal or multi-modal tasks. The experimental results on VGGSound dataset show that our proposed FoleyGen outperforms previous systems across all objective metrics and human evaluations.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
ViSAGe: Video-to-Spatial Audio Generation
A new model generates first-order ambisonics spatial audio directly from silent video and camera direction, with a new 102K-clip dataset and spatial evaluation metrics.
-
Efficient Video-to-Audio Generation via Multiple Foundation Models Mapper
A GPT-2 mapper over dual visual encoders claims 16% training cost and better alignment, but test-time use of true class labels makes the comparison invalid for V2A.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.