REVIEW 4 cited by
Corex: Pushing the Boundaries of Complex Reasoning through Multi-Model Collaboration
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) are evolving at an unprecedented pace and have exhibited considerable capability in the realm of natural language processing (NLP) with world knowledge. Benefiting from ultra-large-scale training corpora, a single LLM can manage typical NLP tasks competently. However, its performance in executing reasoning tasks is still confined by the limitations of its internal representations. To push this boundary further, we introduce Corex in this paper, a suite of novel general-purpose strategies that transform LLMs into autonomous agents pioneering multi-model collaborations for complex task-solving. Inspired by human behaviors, Corex is constituted by diverse collaboration paradigms including Debate, Review, and Retrieve modes, which collectively work towards enhancing the factuality, faithfulness, and reliability of the reasoning process. These paradigms foster task-agnostic approaches that enable LLMs to ''think outside the box,'' thereby overcoming hallucinations and providing better solutions. Through extensive experiments across four different types of reasoning tasks, we demonstrate that orchestrating multiple LLMs to work in concert yields substantially better performance compared to existing methods. Further results and in-depth analysis demonstrate the cost-effectiveness of our method, facilitating collaboration among different LLMs and promoting annotation efficiency.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Multi-Agent Debate Strategies: Survey, Taxonomy, and Challenges
A systematic review of 141 papers derives a three-axis taxonomy of multi-agent debate design (participants, interaction, agreement) and shows the field has converged on a narrow default pattern.
-
OdysseyArena: Benchmarking Large Language Models For Long-Horizon, Active and Inductive Interactions
OdysseyArena shows that frontier LLMs follow explicit rules well but fail to induce hidden environment rules through long-horizon trial and error, scoring far below humans across four interactive tasks.
-
Dynamic Collaboration of Multi-Language Models based on Minimal Complete Semantic Units
MCSU-based vocabulary alignment plus distance-based dynamic selection (DDS) lets several LLMs vote token-by-token, beating single models and prior ensemble baselines on multiple reasoning benchmarks without training.
-
CodeEvo: Interaction-Driven Synthesis of Code-centric Data through Hybrid and Iterative Feedback
CodeEvo uses two interacting LLM agents with keyword-guided instruction evolution and hybrid compiler-plus-LLM feedback to synthesize high-quality instruction-code pairs for fine-tuning code models.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.