Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Corex: Pushing the Boundaries of Complex Reasoning through Multi-Model Collaboration

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.00280 v3 pith:FZBZIWCY submitted 2023-09-30 cs.AI cs.CL

classification cs.AIcs.CL
keywords llmsreasoningcollaborationcorextasksbettercomplexdemonstrate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are evolving at an unprecedented pace and have exhibited considerable capability in the realm of natural language processing (NLP) with world knowledge. Benefiting from ultra-large-scale training corpora, a single LLM can manage typical NLP tasks competently. However, its performance in executing reasoning tasks is still confined by the limitations of its internal representations. To push this boundary further, we introduce Corex in this paper, a suite of novel general-purpose strategies that transform LLMs into autonomous agents pioneering multi-model collaborations for complex task-solving. Inspired by human behaviors, Corex is constituted by diverse collaboration paradigms including Debate, Review, and Retrieve modes, which collectively work towards enhancing the factuality, faithfulness, and reliability of the reasoning process. These paradigms foster task-agnostic approaches that enable LLMs to ''think outside the box,'' thereby overcoming hallucinations and providing better solutions. Through extensive experiments across four different types of reasoning tasks, we demonstrate that orchestrating multiple LLMs to work in concert yields substantially better performance compared to existing methods. Further results and in-depth analysis demonstrate the cost-effectiveness of our method, facilitating collaboration among different LLMs and promoting annotation efficiency.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Multi-Agent Debate Strategies: Survey, Taxonomy, and Challenges

    cs.SE 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    A systematic review of 141 papers derives a three-axis taxonomy of multi-agent debate design (participants, interaction, agreement) and shows the field has converged on a narrow default pattern.

  2. OdysseyArena: Benchmarking Large Language Models For Long-Horizon, Active and Inductive Interactions

    cs.CL 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    OdysseyArena shows that frontier LLMs follow explicit rules well but fail to induce hidden environment rules through long-horizon trial and error, scoring far below humans across four interactive tasks.

  3. Dynamic Collaboration of Multi-Language Models based on Minimal Complete Semantic Units

    cs.AI 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MCSU-based vocabulary alignment plus distance-based dynamic selection (DDS) lets several LLMs vote token-by-token, beating single models and prior ensemble baselines on multiple reasoning benchmarks without training.

  4. CodeEvo: Interaction-Driven Synthesis of Code-centric Data through Hybrid and Iterative Feedback

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CodeEvo uses two interacting LLM agents with keyword-guided instruction evolution and hybrid compiler-plus-LLM feedback to synthesize high-quality instruction-code pairs for fine-tuning code models.

Pith tools