Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

Simulating Social Media Using Large Language Models to Evaluate Alternative News Feed Algorithms

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.05984 v1 pith:ANXNKW3T submitted 2023-10-05 cs.SI cs.AIcs.MA

classification cs.SIcs.AIcs.MA
keywords socialmedianewsalgorithmsconversationsfeedmodelsother
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Social media is often criticized for amplifying toxic discourse and discouraging constructive conversations. But designing social media platforms to promote better conversations is inherently challenging. This paper asks whether simulating social media through a combination of Large Language Models (LLM) and Agent-Based Modeling can help researchers study how different news feed algorithms shape the quality of online conversations. We create realistic personas using data from the American National Election Study to populate simulated social media platforms. Next, we prompt the agents to read and share news articles - and like or comment upon each other's messages - within three platforms that use different news feed algorithms. In the first platform, users see the most liked and commented posts from users whom they follow. In the second, they see posts from all users - even those outside their own network. The third platform employs a novel "bridging" algorithm that highlights posts that are liked by people with opposing political views. We find this bridging algorithm promotes more constructive, non-toxic, conversation across political divides than the other two models. Though further research is needed to evaluate these findings, we argue that LLMs hold considerable potential to improve simulation research on social media and many other complex social settings.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Eco3S: Complex Socio-Economic System Simulation via Agent-Based Models

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Eco3S packages co-evolving environments, checkpoint counterfactuals, and auto-refinement into one LLM agent-based simulation platform, demonstrated on canal-rebellion, state-formation, and information-spread cases.

  2. Burst: Collaborative Curation in Connected Social Media Communities

    cs.HC 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Routing posts from small trusted teams into larger channels through member votes, with thresholds that scale with channel size, produced active collaborative curation and reduced posting hesitancy in a 36-person, ten-...

  3. SimSpark: Interactive Simulation of Social Media Behaviors

    cs.HC 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    SimSpark combines LLM-powered agents with interactive visualizations to simulate believable, customizable social media behaviors such as posting, liking, following, and replying.

  4. Can Generative Agent-Based Modeling Replicate the Friendship Paradox in Social Media Simulations?

    cs.SI 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    LLM-driven agent simulations of social media reproduce the Friendship Paradox and its variants, driven mainly by infrequent connections to highly popular agents.

  5. Bridging HCI and AI Research for the Evaluation of Conversational SE Assistants

    cs.SE 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    A position paper proposing that combining simulated users and LLM-as-a-Judge can meet the requirements for human-centered automatic evaluation of conversational SE assistants, without empirical validation.

  6. Prosocial Design in Trust and Safety

    cs.HC 2025-06 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A review chapter synthesizes evidence that proactive design features can reduce harmful behavior and misinformation spread, while acknowledging the field is young.

Pith tools