Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Better and Simpler Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Statistical Estimation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.06289 v2 pith:AZVQ6XJT submitted 2023-10-10 math.ST cs.CRcs.DScs.ITcs.LGmath.ITstat.TH

classification math.STcs.CRcs.DScs.ITcs.LGmath.ITstat.TH
keywords alphaestimationfraclowerboundcovarianceestimatingleft
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We provide optimal lower bounds for two well-known parameter estimation (also known as statistical estimation) tasks in high dimensions with approximate differential privacy. First, we prove that for any $\alpha \le O(1)$, estimating the covariance of a Gaussian up to spectral error $\alpha$ requires $\tilde{\Omega}\left(\frac{d^{3/2}}{\alpha \varepsilon} + \frac{d}{\alpha^2}\right)$ samples, which is tight up to logarithmic factors. This result improves over previous work which established this for $\alpha \le O\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{d}}\right)$, and is also simpler than previous work. Next, we prove that estimating the mean of a heavy-tailed distribution with bounded $k$th moments requires $\tilde{\Omega}\left(\frac{d}{\alpha^{k/(k-1)} \varepsilon} + \frac{d}{\alpha^2}\right)$ samples. Previous work for this problem was only able to establish this lower bound against pure differential privacy, or in the special case of $k = 2$. Our techniques follow the method of fingerprinting and are generally quite simple. Our lower bound for heavy-tailed estimation is based on a black-box reduction from privately estimating identity-covariance Gaussians. Our lower bound for covariance estimation utilizes a Bayesian approach to show that, under an Inverse Wishart prior distribution for the covariance matrix, no private estimator can be accurate even in expectation, without sufficiently many samples.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Fingerprinting Codes Meet Geometry: Improved Lower Bounds for Private Query Release and Adaptive Data Analysis

    cs.DS 2024-12 reject novelty 8.0 of 10

    The geometric fingerprinting framework yields new lower bounds for adaptive data analysis and random queries, but the claimed log(1/delta) matching bound for private query release is not established by the proof.

  2. Lower Bounds for Public-Private Learning under Distribution Shift

    cs.LG 2025-07 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    For Gaussian mean estimation and linear regression with distribution shift, the paper claims that public data never provides complementary value: either public data alone suffices, or (for large shifts) private data a...

Pith tools