REVIEW 4 cited by
Tree-Planner: Efficient Close-loop Task Planning with Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This paper studies close-loop task planning, which refers to the process of generating a sequence of skills (a plan) to accomplish a specific goal while adapting the plan based on real-time observations. Recently, prompting Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate actions iteratively has become a prevalent paradigm due to its superior performance and user-friendliness. However, this paradigm is plagued by two inefficiencies: high token consumption and redundant error correction, both of which hinder its scalability for large-scale testing and applications. To address these issues, we propose Tree-Planner, which reframes task planning with LLMs into three distinct phases: plan sampling, action tree construction, and grounded deciding. Tree-Planner starts by using an LLM to sample a set of potential plans before execution, followed by the aggregation of them to form an action tree. Finally, the LLM performs a top-down decision-making process on the tree, taking into account real-time environmental information. Experiments show that Tree-Planner achieves state-of-the-art performance while maintaining high efficiency. By decomposing LLM queries into a single plan-sampling call and multiple grounded-deciding calls, a considerable part of the prompt are less likely to be repeatedly consumed. As a result, token consumption is reduced by 92.2% compared to the previously best-performing model. Additionally, by enabling backtracking on the action tree as needed, the correction process becomes more flexible, leading to a 40.5% decrease in error corrections.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Weights or Skills? A Survey of Robot-Learning Techniques: from Action-Predicting Weights to Robots that Write their Own Skills
A taxonomy of robot learning on a weights-versus-skills axis, with a five-rung self-improvement ladder whose top cell (feedback plus memory plus search) holds only a few recent systems.
-
RoboHarness: Memory-Driven Orchestration of Heterogeneous Robot Policies for Long-Horizon Planning
RoboHarness combines VLAs, RL policies, and TAMP planners via an LLM router and a memory-bridge handoff, reporting 95.2% average success on long-horizon LIBERO-LoHo versus 64.8% for the best baseline.
-
O$^2$-Searcher: A Searching-based Agent Model for Open-Domain Open-Ended Question Answering
O2-Searcher uses GRPO reinforcement learning to teach a 3B LLM to search a local corpus and answer open-ended and closed-ended questions, and introduces the O2-QA benchmark.
-
Virtual Agent Economies
Proposes a two-axis framework (emergent versus intentional, permeable versus impermeable) for the coming AI agent economy and argues for proactively designing steerable agent markets.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.