Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

CodeScope: An Execution-based Multilingual Multitask Multidimensional Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Code Understanding and Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.08588 v3 pith:E4DDR5BT submitted 2023-11-14 cs.CL cs.AIcs.SE

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.SE
keywords codecodescopellmsprogrammingbenchmarksgenerationtasksbenchmark
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance on assisting humans in programming and facilitating programming automation. However, existing benchmarks for evaluating the code understanding and generation capacities of LLMs suffer from severe limitations. First, most benchmarks are insufficient as they focus on a narrow range of popular programming languages and specific tasks, whereas real-world software development scenarios show a critical need to implement systems with multilingual and multitask programming environments to satisfy diverse requirements. Second, most benchmarks fail to consider the actual executability and the consistency of execution results of the generated code. To bridge these gaps between existing benchmarks and expectations from practical applications, we introduce CodeScope, an execution-based, multilingual, multitask, multidimensional evaluation benchmark for comprehensively measuring LLM capabilities on coding tasks. CodeScope covers 43 programming languages and eight coding tasks. It evaluates the coding performance of LLMs from three dimensions (perspectives): length, difficulty, and efficiency. To facilitate execution-based evaluations of code generation, we develop MultiCodeEngine, an automated code execution engine that supports 14 programming languages. Finally, we systematically evaluate and analyze eight mainstream LLMs and demonstrate the superior breadth and challenges of CodeScope for evaluating LLMs on code understanding and generation tasks compared to other benchmarks. The CodeScope benchmark and code are publicly available at https://github.com/WeixiangYAN/CodeScope.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Copilot Arena: A Platform for Code LLM Evaluation in the Wild

    cs.SE 2025-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    An in-IDE pairwise-preference platform for code LLMs reveals that real developer choices rank models differently than static coding benchmarks.

  2. LessLeak-Bench: A First Investigation of Data Leakage in LLMs Across 83 Software Engineering Benchmarks

    cs.SE 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Across 83 SE benchmarks, average leakage into StarCoder's pretraining data is 4.8% (Python), 2.8% (Java), and 0.7% (C/C++), but QuixBugs and BigCloneBench are 100% and 55.7% leaked.

  3. GeoPandas-AI: A Smart Class Bringing LLM as Stateful AI Code Assistant

    cs.HC 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A new open-source Python class, GeoDataFrameAI, adds a stateful LLM chat interface directly to GeoPandas data frames for geospatial code generation and analysis.

Pith tools