Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Non-archimedean topological monoids

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.09187 v4 pith:F6N34UBI submitted 2023-11-15 math.GN math.DSmath.FA

classification math.GNmath.DSmath.FA
keywords monoidstopologicalmonoiduniversaldefinedl-naleftmany
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

We say that a topological monoid $S$ is left non-archimedean (in short: l-NA) if the left action of $S$ on itself admits a proper $S$-compactification $\nu \colon S \hookrightarrow Y$ such that $Y$ is a Stone space. This provides a natural generalization of the well known concept of NA topological groups. The Stone and Pontryagin dualities play major role in achieving useful characterizations of NA monoids. We discuss universal NA monoids and show that many naturally defined topological monoids are NA. We show that many naturally defined topological monoids are NA and present universal NA monoids. Among others, we prove that the Polish monoid $C(2^{\omega},2^{\omega})$ is a universal separable metrizable l-NA monoid and the Polish monoid ${\mathbb N}^{\mathbb N}$ is universal for separable metrizable r-NA monoids.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Evolution of Alpha in Finance Harnessing Human Insight and LLM Agents

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A review paper organizes alpha-generation methods into a five-stage taxonomy and proposes trust and explainability metrics for AI trading systems, without empirical validation.

Pith tools