Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Exploiting Novel GPT-4 APIs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.14302 v2 pith:QBBVIGVV submitted 2023-12-21 cs.CR cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
keywords apisgpt-4accessfindfunctionmodelretrievalexamples
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Language model attacks typically assume one of two extreme threat models: full white-box access to model weights, or black-box access limited to a text generation API. However, real-world APIs are often more flexible than just text generation: these APIs expose "gray-box" access leading to new threat vectors. To explore this, we red-team three new functionalities exposed in the GPT-4 APIs: fine-tuning, function calling and knowledge retrieval. We find that fine-tuning a model on as few as 15 harmful examples or 100 benign examples can remove core safeguards from GPT-4, enabling a range of harmful outputs. Furthermore, we find that GPT-4 Assistants readily divulge the function call schema and can be made to execute arbitrary function calls. Finally, we find that knowledge retrieval can be hijacked by injecting instructions into retrieval documents. These vulnerabilities highlight that any additions to the functionality exposed by an API can create new vulnerabilities.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AttackEval: A Systematic Empirical Study of Prompt Injection Attack Effectiveness Against Large Language Models

    cs.CR 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Obfuscation alone reaches 76% success against intent-aware defenses; pairing it with emotional manipulation yields 97.6% success under a modeled composite evaluation of 250 prompts.

  2. Layer-Wise Perturbations via Sparse Autoencoders for Adversarial Text Generation

    cs.CL 2025-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Sparse autoencoder activation perturbation (SFPF) applied on top of existing jailbreak prompts raises attack success rate on Qwen3-32B, but with no defense evaluation and weak reproducibility.

  3. Veracity: An Open-Source AI Fact-Checking System

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Veracity is an open-source LLM-plus-web-search fact-checking app with a 0 to 100 reliability score and explanations, but no evaluation of its accuracy is included.

Pith tools