Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Large Language Models Can Solve Real-World Planning Rigorously with Formal Verification Tools

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.11891 v3 pith:23K2F2OP submitted 2024-04-18 cs.AI cs.CLcs.HC

Large Language Models Can Solve Real-World Planning Rigorously with Formal Verification Tools

classification cs.AI cs.CLcs.HC
keywords frameworkplanningproblemstravelcomplexeffectivelanguagelarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) struggle to directly generate correct plans for complex multi-constraint planning problems, even with self-verification and self-critique. For example, a U.S. domestic travel planning benchmark TravelPlanner was proposed in Xie et al. (2024), where the best LLM OpenAI o1-preview can only find viable travel plans with a 10% success rate given all needed information. In this work, we tackle this by proposing an LLM-based planning framework that formalizes and solves complex multi-constraint planning problems as constrained satisfiability problems, which are further consumed by sound and complete satisfiability solvers. We start with TravelPlanner as the primary use case and show that our framework achieves a success rate of 93.9% and is effective with diverse paraphrased prompts. More importantly, our framework has strong zero-shot generalizability, successfully handling unseen constraints in our newly created unseen international travel dataset and generalizing well to new fundamentally different domains. Moreover, when user input queries are infeasible, our framework can identify the unsatisfiable core, provide failure reasons, and offers personalized modification suggestions. We show that our framework can modify and solve for an average of 81.6% and 91.7% unsatisfiable queries from two datasets and prove with ablations that all key components of our framework are effective and necessary. Project page: https://sites.google.com/view/llm-rwplanning.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Nidus: Externalized Reasoning for AI-Assisted Engineering

    cs.SE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Nidus externalizes engineering methodology into a decidable, self-constraining artifact that LLMs must satisfy during development, enabling recursive governance of a large self-hosted system.

  2. Beyond the Leaderboard: A Synthesis of Tool-Use, Planning, and Reasoning Failures in Large Language Model Agents

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0

    A narrative synthesis of 27 agent evaluation papers identifies six recurring failure clusters and finds that agent failures compound non-linearly with task length, sub-skills do not compose into end-to-end success, an...