pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.11900 · v1 · pith:23YTDRL7new · submitted 2026-06-10 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · astro-ph.GA

A Jet from a Nearly Dormant Black Hole

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 08:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GA
keywords supermassive black holesradio jetsvery long baseline interferometryNGC 4649low accretion ratescore shift
0
0 comments X

The pith

Observations detect a two-sided jet from the supermassive black hole in M60 despite an Eddington ratio of 10^{-8}.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports multi-frequency VLBI observations that reveal a compact two-sided jet with a steep synchrotron spectrum in the elliptical galaxy M60. This source hosts a supermassive black hole accreting at roughly 10^{-8} of the Eddington limit, placing it in a nearly dormant state. The data also show an unusually steep frequency-dependent shift in the position of the radio core, which places the central engine only about 10 Schwarzschild radii upstream of the observed 8.37 GHz core. General relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations reproduce both the jet shape and the core shift when the outflow is magnetically dominated and far from equipartition. The result indicates that jet collimation can continue even when accretion has dropped to extremely low levels.

Core claim

Multi-frequency very long baseline interferometric observations detect a compact two-sided jet with an unusually steep synchrotron spectrum in NGC 4649. The apparent radio core exhibits an unprecedentedly steep frequency-dependent position shift toward the SMBH, locating the central engine only about 57 microarcseconds (projected distance of about 10 Schwarzschild radii) upstream of the 8.37 GHz core. General relativistic magnetohydrodynamic and radiative-transfer simulations reproduce the observed jet morphology and core-shift behaviour, indicating a magnetically dominated, non-equipartition jet-launching region.

What carries the argument

The steep frequency-dependent core shift together with GRMHD simulations that require magnetic dominance to match the data.

If this is right

  • Collimated outflows can be sustained at accretion rates as low as 10^{-8} of the Eddington limit.
  • The jet-launching region lies within roughly 10 Schwarzschild radii of the event horizon.
  • Standard conical equipartition models fail; magnetic dominance is required to explain the observations.
  • M60 becomes a laboratory for studying jet formation on event-horizon scales in the lowest-accretion regime.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar faint jets may exist around Sgr A* and the M31 nucleus but remain undetected with current resolution.
  • Jet persistence at such low accretion rates could alter estimates of black-hole feedback in quiescent galaxies.
  • The required magnetic dominance supplies a lower bound on the field strength needed for collimation near dormant black holes.

Load-bearing premise

The detected compact radio structure and its frequency-dependent position shift are produced by a jet launched by the central black hole rather than by unrelated emission or instrumental effects.

What would settle it

Multi-frequency imaging that shows the same radio component at all frequencies with no measurable position shift or with a flat spectrum instead of the reported steep spectrum.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.11900 by Bong Won Sohn, Feng Yuan, Hai Yang, Hyunwook Ro, John E. Conway, Jun Yang, Lulu Fan, Niu Liu, Rusen Lu, Taehyun Jung, Wen Chen, Xiaofeng Li, Xiaopeng Cheng, Yihang Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Photon ring diameter (5.2 RS) as a function of Eddington ratio. Filled circles and open triangles represent VLBI and VLA total flux density at 5 GHz, respectively. The color represents the total flux density. The grey region on the left denotes the dormant black holes, whereas the white region on the right denotes the active AGN. We assume the transition from λEdd = 10−7 . The Extended Data [PITH_FULL_IMA… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: VLBI images of M60∗ at 1.64 and 4.87 GHz, and the quasi-simultaneous spectra. Left: 1.64 GHz naturally weighted EVN + VLBA combined CLEAN image showing the large scale of the radio jet; Middle: 4.87 GHz VLBA naturally weighted CLEAN image showing the close-up view of the sub-parsec scale jet; Right: Best-fitting power-law spectra (S ν ∝ ν α ) for the total flux density (red) and for components N (blue) and… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Left: Separation of the radio core from the reference 8.37 GHz core as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Self-calibrated images of J1246+1153. The top-left and top-right panels correspond to 1.46 GHz and 1.64 GHz, respectively; the middle-left and middle-right panels show 2.3 GHz and 4.87 GHz; and the bottom panel displays the 8.37 GHz image. All images were made using natural weighting. The lowest contours are at ±3 times rms noise and further positive contours are drawn at increasing steps of 2. The gray el… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Self-calibrated images of M60∗ . The top-left and top-right panels correspond to 1.46 GHz and 1.64 GHz, respectively; the middle-left and middle-right panels show 2.3 GHz and 4.87 GHz; and the bottom panel displays the 8.37 GHz image. All images were made using natural weighting. The lowest contours are at ±3 times rms noise and further positive contours are drawn at increasing steps of 2. The gray ellipse… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The top row presents the intrinsic simulated jet emission at 1.64 GHz (left), 4.87 GHz [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Simulated radio spectrum of the jet. The flux density decreases with frequency, showing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Simulated core shift as a function of observing frequency. The dots show the simulated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Two-dimensional distribution of the magnetization parameter, shown as log [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Most galaxies host supermassive black holes (SMBHs) that remain weakly accreting or dormant for much of their lifetimes. At the lowest accretion rates, these systems may represent the transition between active nuclei and dormant black holes, but whether they can still launch collimated jets remains unclear. The nuclei in our Galaxy (\sgra) and M31 are key examples of this regime, although no clear jet structure has yet been detected in either source. Here we report multi-frequency very long baseline interferometric observations of \Msixty\ (NGC~4649), a nearby elliptical galaxy hosting a nearly dormant SMBH with an Eddington ratio of $\sim10^{-8}$. We detect a compact two-sided jet with an unusually steep synchrotron spectrum, demonstrating that collimated outflows can persist even under nearly dormant accretion conditions. The apparent radio core exhibits an unprecedentedly steep frequency-dependent position shift toward the SMBH, locating the central engine only $\sim57\,\mu$as, corresponding to a projected distance of $\sim10$ Schwarzschild radii, upstream of the 8.37-GHz core. The observed jet morphology and steep core-shift behaviour are reproduced by general relativistic magnetohydrodynamic and radiative-transfer simulations, indicating a magnetically dominated, non-equipartition jet-launching region that departs from the standard conical equipartition picture. These results provide direct observational evidence that jet production can survive near the dormant SMBHs and establish \Msixty\ as a unique laboratory for probing jet formation on event-horizon scales in the lowest-accretion SMBH regime.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports multi-frequency VLBI observations of NGC 4649 (M60) detecting a compact two-sided jet with steep synchrotron spectrum from its SMBH at ~10^{-8} Eddington ratio. It measures an unusually steep frequency-dependent core position shift of ~57 μas, locating the central engine ~10 Schwarzschild radii upstream of the 8.37 GHz core, and shows that GRMHD plus radiative-transfer simulations reproduce both the jet morphology and the core-shift behavior, indicating a magnetically dominated non-equipartition launch region.

Significance. If the jet identification and core-shift interpretation are robust, the result would provide direct evidence that collimated outflows can persist at extremely low accretion rates, extending our understanding of jet production near dormant SMBHs and establishing M60 as a laboratory for horizon-scale studies. The multi-frequency VLBI dataset combined with simulation comparison is a methodological strength.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4] §4 (Core position measurements): The reported ~57 μas frequency-dependent shift and its attribution to synchrotron self-absorption in a non-equipartition flow requires an explicit quantitative error budget addressing refractive interstellar effects and residual phase-calibration systematics at the micro-arcsecond level; without such a test (e.g., closure-phase consistency across bands), the placement of the engine at ~10 Rs remains vulnerable to alternative explanations.
  2. [§5] §5 (Simulation comparison): The claim that GRMHD+RT runs reproduce the observed morphology and steep core-shift without post-hoc parameter adjustment is central to the non-equipartition interpretation, yet the manuscript does not appear to present the explored parameter space or a quantitative goodness-of-fit metric demonstrating that the match is not forced by tuning of magnetic field or electron distribution parameters.
  3. [§3] §3 (Jet detection): The two-sided compact structure is interpreted as an SMBH-launched jet rather than unrelated emission or calibration artifacts, but the paper lacks reported multi-epoch proper-motion limits or additional tests that would independently exclude refractive or instrumental origins at the claimed precision.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the spectrum is 'unusually steep'; adding a direct numerical comparison to core-shift indices in other LLAGN would clarify the 'unprecedented' claim.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions for the VLBI images should include the exact restoring beam sizes and contour levels used at each frequency to allow independent assessment of the two-sided structure.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable comments on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments below and indicate where revisions will be made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (Core position measurements): The reported ~57 μas frequency-dependent shift and its attribution to synchrotron self-absorption in a non-equipartition flow requires an explicit quantitative error budget addressing refractive interstellar effects and residual phase-calibration systematics at the micro-arcsecond level; without such a test (e.g., closure-phase consistency across bands), the placement of the engine at ~10 Rs remains vulnerable to alternative explanations.

    Authors: We concur that an explicit quantitative error budget is necessary to robustly support the core-shift measurement. In the revised manuscript, we will expand §4 to include a detailed error analysis quantifying the potential contributions from refractive interstellar scintillation and residual phase-calibration errors at the μas level. Additionally, we will report closure-phase consistency tests performed across the observed frequency bands to confirm that the measured shift is intrinsic rather than due to systematics. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5] §5 (Simulation comparison): The claim that GRMHD+RT runs reproduce the observed morphology and steep core-shift without post-hoc parameter adjustment is central to the non-equipartition interpretation, yet the manuscript does not appear to present the explored parameter space or a quantitative goodness-of-fit metric demonstrating that the match is not forced by tuning of magnetic field or electron distribution parameters.

    Authors: The simulations presented were conducted using GRMHD models with magnetic field strengths and electron distributions appropriate for the low accretion rate regime of M60, without post-hoc tuning to match the specific core-shift value. To provide greater transparency, the revised manuscript will include a description of the parameter ranges explored in the GRMHD and radiative transfer calculations, along with a quantitative goodness-of-fit assessment (e.g., via structural similarity or chi-squared metrics) between the simulated and observed images and core positions. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§3] §3 (Jet detection): The two-sided compact structure is interpreted as an SMBH-launched jet rather than unrelated emission or calibration artifacts, but the paper lacks reported multi-epoch proper-motion limits or additional tests that would independently exclude refractive or instrumental origins at the claimed precision.

    Authors: The jet identification relies on the detection of a symmetric two-sided structure with a steep synchrotron spectrum that is consistent across multiple frequencies, features that are difficult to attribute to calibration artifacts or refractive interstellar effects, which typically do not produce such frequency-dependent but morphologically consistent emission. We note that our dataset consists of single-epoch observations, so multi-epoch proper-motion measurements are not available. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Absence of multi-epoch VLBI observations, which precludes reporting proper-motion limits to further rule out alternative explanations for the detected structure.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; result is direct observational detection

full rationale

The paper reports multi-frequency VLBI detections of a two-sided compact structure and frequency-dependent core shift in M60, with the central claim resting on these empirical measurements rather than any derivation that reduces to fitted parameters or self-citations by construction. GRMHD+RT simulations are invoked only for post-observation interpretation and morphological matching, without the observed jet or shift being defined in terms of the simulation outputs. No self-definitional, fitted-input-as-prediction, or load-bearing self-citation steps appear in the abstract or described chain; the work is self-contained against external VLBI data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the claim rests on the interpretation that the observed radio morphology is synchrotron emission from a magnetically dominated jet and that the GRMHD simulations reproduce the data without undisclosed free parameters.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5856 in / 1148 out tokens · 23184 ms · 2026-06-27T08:58:51.752787+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

179 extracted references · 109 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Previous core-shift measurements in nearby AGNs have typically yielded power-law indices kclose to unity 7, 21, 29, consistent with this expectation 20. Notable exceptions include NGC 315, which exhibits a modest deviation from equipartition withk=1.28±0.11 30, and 3C 454.3, where temporal variations inkfrom∼0.6 to∼2.2 have been reported 31. However, in t...

  2. [2]

    Ho, L. C. Nuclear activity in nearby galaxies.ARA&A46, 475–539 (2008).0803.2268

  3. [3]

    & Tremaine, S

    Yu, Q. & Tremaine, S. Observational constraints on growth of massive black holes.MNRAS 335, 965–976 (2002).astro-ph/0203082

  4. [4]

    & Narayan, R

    Yuan, F. & Narayan, R. Hot Accretion Flows Around Black Holes.ARA&A52, 529–588 (2014).1401.0586

  5. [5]

    Inayoshi, K., Ichikawa, K. & Ho, L. C. Universal Transition Diagram from Dormant to Actively Accreting Supermassive Black Holes.ApJ894, 141 (2020).2001.11032

  6. [6]

    P., Ros, E

    Boccardi, B., Krichbaum, T. P., Ros, E. & Zensus, J. A. Radio observations of active galactic nuclei with mm-VLBI.A&A Rev.25, 4 (2017).1711.07548. 19 Figure 6: The top row presents the intrinsic simulated jet emission at 1.64 GHz (left), 4.87 GHz (middle), and 15 GHz (right). The bottom row shows the corresponding beam-convolved images at 1.6 GHz (left), ...

  7. [7]

    S., Huang, J

    Gu, Q. S., Huang, J. S., Wilson, G. & Fazio, G. G. Direct Evidence from Spitzer for a Low- Luminosity AGN at the Center of the Elliptical Galaxy NGC 315.ApJ671, L105–L108 (2007).0711.0051

  8. [8]

    Nature477, 185–187 (2011)

    Hada, K.et al.An origin of the radio jet in M87 at the location of the central black hole. Nature477, 185–187 (2011)

  9. [9]

    L.et al.Probing the Parsec-scale Accretion Flow of 3C 84 with Millimeter Wavelength Polarimetry.ApJ797, 66 (2014).1410.5887

    Plambeck, R. L.et al.Probing the Parsec-scale Accretion Flow of 3C 84 with Millimeter Wavelength Polarimetry.ApJ797, 66 (2014).1410.5887

  10. [10]

    Blandford, R. D. & Znajek, R. L. Electromagnetic extraction of energy from Kerr black holes.MNRAS179, 433–456 (1977)

  11. [12]

    & Yang, H

    Yuan, F., Wang, H. & Yang, H. The Accretion Flow in M87 is Really MAD.ApJ924, 124 (2022).2201.00512

  12. [14]

    P., Haiman, Z

    Inayoshi, K., Ostriker, J. P., Haiman, Z. & Kuiper, R. Low-density, radiatively inefficient rotating-accretion flow on to a black hole.MNRAS476, 1412–1426 (2018).1709.07452

  13. [15]

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaborationet al.First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. V . Testing Astrophysical Models of the Galactic Center Black Hole.ApJ930, L16 (2022)

  14. [16]

    & Psaltis, D

    Ben Zineb, Y ., Ozel, F. & Psaltis, D. Advancing Black Hole Imaging with Space-Based Interferometry.arXiv e-printsarXiv:2412.01904 (2024).2412.01904

  15. [17]

    Lee, M. G. & Jang, I. S. Resolving the Discrepancy of Distance to M60, a Giant Elliptical Galaxy in Virgo.ApJ841, 23 (2017).1705.02389

  16. [18]

    A., Pushkarev, A

    Koryukova, T. A., Pushkarev, A. B., Plavin, A. V . & Kovalev, Y . Y . Tracing Milky Way scattering by compact extragalactic radio sources.MNRAS515, 1736–1750 (2022).2201. 04359

  17. [20]

    A., Ratner, M

    Bartel, N., Herring, T. A., Ratner, M. I., Shapiro, I. I. & Corey, B. E. VLBI limits on the proper motion of the ‘core’ of the superluminal quasar 3C345.Nature319, 733–738 (1986)

  18. [21]

    Lobanov, A. P. Ultracompact jets in active galactic nuclei.A&A330, 79–89 (1998). astro-ph/9712132. 22

  19. [22]

    O’Sullivan, S. P. & Gabuzda, D. C. Magnetic field strength and spectral distribution of six parsec-scale active galactic nuclei jets.MNRAS400, 26–42 (2009).0907.5211

  20. [23]

    & Falcke, H

    Fraga-Encinas, R., Mo ´scibrodzka, M. & Falcke, H. The core-shift of Sagittarius A* as a discriminant between disk and jet emission models with millimeter very long baseline inter- ferometry.A&A706, A151 (2026).2312.12951

  21. [24]

    Li, X.et al.A Centiparsec-scale Compact Radio Core in the Nearby Galaxy M60.ApJ960, 1 (2024).2311.06126

  22. [25]

    Boettcher, M., Harris, D. E. & Krawczynski, H.Relativistic Jets from Active Galactic Nuclei (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2012)

  23. [26]

    Cheng, X.et al.Toward Microarcsecond Astrometry for the Innermost Wobbling Jet of the BL Lacertae Object OJ 287.ApJ955, L30 (2023).2309.03635

  24. [27]

    Park, J.et al.Kinematics of the M87 Jet in the Collimation Zone: Gradual Acceleration and Velocity Stratification.ApJ887, 147 (2019).1911.02279

  25. [28]

    Park, J.et al.Jet Collimation and Acceleration in the Giant Radio Galaxy NGC 315.ApJ 909, 76 (2021).2012.14154

  26. [29]

    Relativistic jets as X-ray and gamma-ray sources.ApJ243, 700–709 (1981)

    Konigl, A. Relativistic jets as X-ray and gamma-ray sources.ApJ243, 700–709 (1981)

  27. [30]

    V ., Kovalev, Y

    Sokolovsky, K. V ., Kovalev, Y . Y ., Pushkarev, A. B. & Lobanov, A. P. A VLBA survey of the core shift effect in AGN jets. I. Evidence of dominating synchrotron opacity.A&A532, A38 (2011).1103.6032

  28. [31]

    Ricci, L.et al.Spectral and magnetic properties of the jet base in NGC 315.A&A693, A172 (2025).2411.19126

  29. [32]

    Chamani, W.et al.Time variability of the core-shift effect in the blazar 3C 454.3.A&A672, A130 (2023).2209.13301

  30. [33]

    C.et al.The Proper Motion of the Galactic Center Pulsar Relative to Sagittarius A*.ApJ798, 120 (2015).1411.0399

    Bower, G. C.et al.The Proper Motion of the Galactic Center Pulsar Relative to Sagittarius A*.ApJ798, 120 (2015).1411.0399

  31. [34]

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaborationet al.First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VIII. Magnetic Field Structure near The Event Horizon.ApJ910, L13 (2021).2105.01173

  32. [35]

    Ro, H.et al.Spectral analysis of a parsec-scale jet in M 87: Observational constraint on the magnetic field strengths in the jet.A&A673, A159 (2023).2303.01014

  33. [36]

    C.et al.ALMA Observations of the Terahertz Spectrum of Sagittarius A*.ApJ 881, L2 (2019).1907.08319

    Bower, G. C.et al.ALMA Observations of the Terahertz Spectrum of Sagittarius A*.ApJ 881, L2 (2019).1907.08319

  34. [37]

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaborationet al.First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. VIII. Physical Interpretation of the Polarized Ring.ApJ964, L26 (2024). 23

  35. [38]

    Chavez, E.et al.Prospects of Detecting a Jet in Sagittarius A* with Very-long-baseline Interferometry.ApJ974, 116 (2024).2405.06029

  36. [39]

    T., Tingay, S

    Deller, A. T., Tingay, S. J., Bailes, M. & West, C. DiFX: A Software Correlator for Very Long Baseline Interferometry Using Multiprocessor Computing Environments.PASP119, 318–336 (2007).astro-ph/0702141

  37. [40]

    T.et al.DiFX-2: A More Flexible, Efficient, Robust, and Powerful Software Correlator.PASP123, 275 (2011).1101.0885

    Deller, A. T.et al.DiFX-2: A More Flexible, Efficient, Robust, and Powerful Software Correlator.PASP123, 275 (2011).1101.0885

  38. [41]

    Greisen, E. W. AIPS, the VLA, and the VLBA. In Heck, A. (ed.)Information Handling in Astronomy - Historical Vistas, vol. 285 ofAstrophysics and Space Science Library, 109 (2003)

  39. [42]

    Keimpema, A.et al.The SFXC software correlator for very long baseline interferometry: algorithms and implementation.Experimental Astronomy39, 259–279 (2015).1502.00467

  40. [43]

    S.et al.Multiwavelength View of the Close-by GRB 190829A Sheds Light on Gamma-Ray Burst Physics.ApJ931, L19 (2022).2106.07169

    Salafia, O. S.et al.Multiwavelength View of the Close-by GRB 190829A Sheds Light on Gamma-Ray Burst Physics.ApJ931, L19 (2022).2106.07169

  41. [44]

    W., Hong, X

    Cheng, X., An, T., Sohn, B. W., Hong, X. & Wang, A. Parsec-scale properties of eight Fanaroff-Riley type 0 radio galaxies.MNRAS506, 1609–1622 (2021).2105.05396

  42. [45]

    & Gebhardt, K

    Shen, J. & Gebhardt, K. The Supermassive Black Hole and Dark Matter Halo of NGC 4649 (M60).ApJ711, 484–494 (2010).0910.4168

  43. [46]

    Woo, J.-H.et al.Do Quiescent and Active Galaxies Have Different M BH-σ∗ Relations?ApJ 772, 49 (2013).1305.2946

  44. [47]

    Paggi, A.et al.Active Galactic Nucleus Feedback in the Hot Halo of NGC 4649.ApJ787, 134 (2014)

  45. [48]

    Paggi, A.et al.Constraining the Physical State of the Hot Gas Halos in NGC 4649 and NGC 5846.ApJ844, 5 (2017).1706.02303

  46. [49]

    Duras, F.et al.Universal bolometric corrections for active galactic nuclei over seven lumi- nosity decades.A&A636, A73 (2020).2001.09984

  47. [50]

    J., Stone, J

    White, C. J., Stone, J. M. & Gammie, C. F. An Extension of the Athena++Code Frame- work for GRMHD Based on Advanced Riemann Solvers and Staggered-mesh Constrained Transport.ApJS225, 22 (2016).1511.00943

  48. [51]

    M., Tomida, K., White, C

    Stone, J. M., Tomida, K., White, C. J. & Felker, K. G. The Athena++Adaptive Mesh Refinement Framework: Design and Magnetohydrodynamic Solvers.ApJS249, 4 (2020). 2005.06651

  49. [52]

    Fishbone, L. G. & Moncrief, V . Relativistic fluid disks in orbit around Kerr black holes.ApJ 207, 962–976 (1976). 24

  50. [53]

    F., Kulkarni, A

    Penna, R. F., Kulkarni, A. & Narayan, R. A new equilibrium torus solution and GRMHD initial conditions.AAP559, A116 (2013).1309.3680

  51. [54]

    Narayan, R., Igumenshchev, I. V . & Abramowicz, M. A. Magnetically Arrested Disk: an Energetically Efficient Accretion Flow.PASJ55, L69–L72 (2003).astro-ph/0305029

  52. [55]

    & McKinney, J

    Tchekhovskoy, A., Narayan, R. & McKinney, J. C. Efficient generation of jets from mag- netically arrested accretion on a rapidly spinning black hole.MNRAS418, L79–L83 (2011). 1108.0412

  53. [56]

    Yang, H.et al.Modeling the inner part of the jet in M87: Confronting jet morphology with theory.Science Advances10, eadn3544 (2024).2403.15950

  54. [57]

    & Shiokawa, H

    Mo ´scibrodzka, M., Falcke, H. & Shiokawa, H. General relativistic magnetohydrodynamical simulations of the jet in M 87.A&A586, A38 (2016).1510.07243

  55. [58]

    & Gammie, C

    Petersen, E. & Gammie, C. Non-thermal models for infrared flares from Sgr A*.MNRAS 494, 5923–5935 (2020)

  56. [59]

    Blandford, R. D. & K ¨onigl, A. Relativistic jets as compact radio sources.ApJ232, 34–48 (1979)

  57. [60]

    & Sironi, L

    Ball, D., ¨Ozel, F., Psaltis, D., Chan, C.-K. & Sironi, L. The Properties of Reconnection Current Sheets in GRMHD Simulations of Radiatively Inefficient Accretion Flows.ApJ853, 184 (2018).1705.06293

  58. [61]

    & Gammie, C

    Mo ´scibrodzka, M. & Gammie, C. F. IPOLE - semi-analytic scheme for relativistic polarized radiative transport.MNRAS475, 43–54 (2018).1712.03057

  59. [62]

    & Narayan, R

    Yuan, F., Quataert, E. & Narayan, R. Nonthermal Electrons in Radiatively Inefficient Accre- tion Flow Models of Sagittarius A*.ApJ598, 301–312 (2003).astro-ph/0304125

  60. [63]

    GRA VITY Collaborationet al.A geometric distance measurement to the Galactic center black hole with 0.3% uncertainty.A&A625, L10 (2019).1904.05721

  61. [64]

    M.et al.Measuring Distance and Properties of the Milky Way’s Central Supermas- sive Black Hole with Stellar Orbits.ApJ689, 1044–1062 (2008).0808.2870

    Ghez, A. M.et al.Measuring Distance and Properties of the Milky Way’s Central Supermas- sive Black Hole with Stellar Orbits.ApJ689, 1044–1062 (2008).0808.2870

  62. [65]

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaborationet al.First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. Testing the Black Hole Metric.ApJ930, L17 (2022)

  63. [66]

    Y ., Shen, Z.-Q., Zhao, J.-H

    Lo, K. Y ., Shen, Z.-Q., Zhao, J.-H. & Ho, P. T. P. Intrinsic Size of Sagittarius A*: 72 Schwarzschild Radii.ApJ508, L61–L64 (1998).astro-ph/9809222

  64. [67]

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaborationet al.First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole.ApJ875, L1 (2019).1906.11238. 25

  65. [68]

    & Jim´enez-Bail´on, E

    Gonz ´alez-Mart´ın, O., Masegosa, J., M´arquez, I., Guainazzi, M. & Jim´enez-Bail´on, E. An X- ray view of 82 LINERs with Chandra and XMM-Newton data.A&A506, 1107–1121 (2009). 0905.2973

  66. [69]

    B.et al.The VSOP 5 GHz Continuum Survey: The Prelaunch VLBA Obser- vations.ApJS131, 95–183 (2000)

    Fomalont, E. B.et al.The VSOP 5 GHz Continuum Survey: The Prelaunch VLBA Obser- vations.ApJS131, 95–183 (2000)

  67. [70]

    Spatially resolved stellar angular momentum, velocity dispersion, and higher moments of the 41 most massive local early-type galaxies

    Veale, M.et al.The MASSIVE Survey - V . Spatially resolved stellar angular momentum, velocity dispersion, and higher moments of the 41 most massive local early-type galaxies. MNRAS464, 356–384 (2017).1609.00391

  68. [71]

    Nature532, 340–342 (2016).1604.01400

    Thomas, J.et al.A 17-billion-solar-mass black hole in a group galaxy with a diffuse core. Nature532, 340–342 (2016).1604.01400

  69. [72]

    & Bender, R

    Beuing, J., Dobereiner, S., Bohringer, H. & Bender, R. X-ray luminosities for a magnitude- limited sample of early-type galaxies from the ROSAT All-Sky Survey.MNRAS302, 209– 221 (1999)

  70. [73]

    Brown, M. J. I., Jannuzi, B. T., Floyd, D. J. E. & Mould, J. R. The Ubiquitous Radio Continuum Emission from the Most Massive Early-type Galaxies.ApJ731, L41 (2011). 1103.2828

  71. [74]

    A., Trujillo, I., Leaman, R

    Beasley, M. A., Trujillo, I., Leaman, R. & Montes, M. A single population of red globular clusters around the massive compact galaxy NGC 1277.Nature555, 483–486 (2018).1803. 04893

  72. [75]

    van den Bosch, R. C. E.et al.An over-massive black hole in the compact lenticular galaxy NGC 1277.Nature491, 729–731 (2012).1211.6429

  73. [76]

    & Krips, M

    Scharw ¨achter, J., Combes, F., Salom´e, P., Sun, M. & Krips, M. The overmassive black hole in NGC 1277: new constraints from molecular gas kinematics.MNRAS457, 4272–4284 (2016).1507.02292

  74. [77]

    Park, S., Yang, J., Oonk, J. B. R. & Paragi, Z. Discovery of five low-luminosity active galactic nuclei at the centre of the Perseus cluster.MNRAS465, 3943–3948 (2017).1611.05986

  75. [78]

    J.et al.Dynamical Measurements of Black Hole Masses in Four Brightest Cluster Galaxies at 100 Mpc.ApJ756, 179 (2012).1203.1620

    McConnell, N. J.et al.Dynamical Measurements of Black Hole Masses in Four Brightest Cluster Galaxies at 100 Mpc.ApJ756, 179 (2012).1203.1620

  76. [79]

    S.et al.The X-ray coronae of the two brightest galaxies in the Coma cluster

    Sanders, J. S.et al.The X-ray coronae of the two brightest galaxies in the Coma cluster. MNRAS439, 1182–1192 (2014).1401.3131

  77. [80]

    Breuval, L.et al.A 1.3% Distance to M33 from Hubble Space Telescope Cepheid Photom- etry.ApJ951, 118 (2023).2304.00037

  78. [81]

    astro-ph/0509839

    Bender, R.et al.HST STIS Spectroscopy of the Triple Nucleus of M31: Two Nested Disks in Keplerian Rotation around a Supermassive Black Hole.ApJ631, 280–300 (2005). astro-ph/0509839. 26

  79. [82]

    R.et al.X-ray and Radio Variability of M31*, The Andromeda Galaxy Nuclear Supermassive Black Hole.ApJ710, 755–763 (2010).0907.4977

    Garcia, M. R.et al.X-ray and Radio Variability of M31*, The Andromeda Galaxy Nuclear Supermassive Black Hole.ApJ710, 755–763 (2010).0907.4977

  80. [83]

    Peng, S.et al.Searching for Radio Outflows from M31* with VLBI Observations.ApJ953, 12 (2023).2306.07189

Showing first 80 references.